Write Letters Demanding Justice!

by -Jefferson Paine

We here at No Compromise HQ want to thank all of our readers and listeners on radio for their continued support, and would like to invite you to consider writing a couple of letters ASAP in seeking justice from our political “leaders”.

First is the case of Ignacio Ramos and Jose Compean, two U.S. Border Patrol agents who attempted to detain a Mexican drug-runner who had infiltrated our sovereign land with his truckload of poison.  Because of alleged irregularities in the reporting of the incident to their management, U.S. attorney Johnny Sutton of Texas decided to make examples of these men and send a chill message to the rest of the U.S. Border Patrol, by railroading them in federal criminal court – while withholding critical information from the jury.

The upshot is that these men ultimately received sentences of 11 and 12 YEARS each simply for protecting our country from murderous invaders.  As they sit in solitary confinement in federal prison, they leave behind two heart-broken wives and SIX fatherless children between them.  On Jan. 3rd, 2009, Mrs. Ramos and her kids came home to find it was ransacked, burglarized, and the interior gas-lines had been left open for nearly two days.

Please send a letter asap to President Bush imploring himto pardon agents Ramos and Compean.  Unfortunately, U.S. attorney Sutton is reported to have a close relationship with the President, and per his propensity for cronyism, is unlikely to issue a pardon.  Yet, still, it’s worth every bit of our efforts to urge President Bush to COMMUTE their sentences if he is so adamantly against their pardons.  Time is critical, for there is only one week left before the Inauguration.  The comment phone-lines at the White House have been shut down for President Bush, so letters are our best option – consider overnighting if possible.  Send your letters to commute the sentences of Ramos & Compean to:

President Bush
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Ave. NW
Washington, DC 20500

———————————————————————————–

And, second, please fire off a letter to the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court and implore them to hear Oral Arguments on Dr. Taitz’ case of Lightfoot vs. Bowen which is before them for consideration.  This case will cause usurper-elect Barack Hussein Obama, once and for all, to furnish such documentation and prove that he is a “Natural Born Citizen” of the United States, and therefore, is Constitutionally qualified to as act as President and to occupy our White House.  Thus far, he refuses to do this simple act of showing proof; so, from a legal standpoint, he is not eligible to assume the Presidency of The United States of America.  Unless, and until, he proves this, any action of his acting as President will be ILLEGAL including the issuing ofcommands to our military, or illegally signing legislation into law which will be null and void of any legal enforcement.

Time is of the essence here, too;  The Supreme Court does not accept emails or phone calls- so we’d like to invite you to send your letters asap for the SCOTUS to accept hearing the case of Lightfoot vs. Bowen to:

Justice (or Chief Justice) (Justice’s Full Name)
Supreme Court of the United States
One First Street N.E.
Washington, DC 20543

Thank you All.    Live Free, or Die!

by -Jefferson Paine

Implore your Justices to Hear This Case!

And why does he continue to hide any and all information about his origins and his true allegiances?!  We may never know – but his attempt to usurp the Presidency of The United States (POTUS) via a massive fraud upon the American People is nearing its completion as of January 9^th, 2009.

The question of our time, and whether this American Nation will continue to endure, is whether our Supreme Court of The United States (SCOTUS) will even entertain hearing the merits of this case, Lightfoot vs. Bowen, intervening against his fraudulent claim upon the U.S. Presidency?

Is it at this point a fait accompli, or will our SCTOUS perform their Constitutional DUTY to the American People, and determine WHO THIS MAN IS – Barack Hussein Obama II ?!

The question that We the People demand to be answered, is a fairly simple one; per Article II of the U.S. Constitution, it states:

            “No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.“

There are three components here that require satisfactory proof, ALL of which must be met in order to be eligible to occupy the Office of POTUS.  Let’s review them:

• I. He must have resided within the U.S. for a minimum of fourteen (14) years – This requirement would undoubtedly be the easiest to prove in the affirmative, at least by affidavits by contemporaneous colleagues and associates. Because he has offered no proof as such, he receives his First Strike against his claim upon the U.S. Presidency.
• II. Second, he must have attained the minimum age of thirty-five (35) years. This, too, would ostensibly be easy for him to prove via multiple affidavits and perhaps contemporaneous documents of his dating before Jan. 20^th, 1974, but again, no such proof has been offered by the usurper-elect. Second Strike. (Again, we recognize that this requirement may be easily proven, if not for his continued secrecy of all originating documentation – such as producing his real Birth Certificate! – see requirement III.)
• III. Third, Barack Hussein Obama II must show sufficient proof that he is a “natural born Citizen” of the United States. This has two parts which both must be met: a.) He must have been a “Natural Born” citizen, and b.) He must now be a Citizen of the United States.
• a. Being “natural born” has two components which both must be met: 1.) He must have been born to parents (plural) who are U.S. Citizens. His mother was ostensibly a U.S. Citizen although no proof has been offered. His Muslim father, Barack Hussein Obama I, undisputedly, was an African national, native-born in British-colonial Kenya, and was therefore then a Kenyan and British colonial subject at the time of the alleged birth of his son. This constitutes, clearly a Third Strike, for his father at no time was a U.S. Citizen. And, 2.) He must show that he was born on U.S. Soil. He has yet to produce, to the public, any proof of a real Birth Certificate showing that he was actually born in Hawaii. There are blood relatives in Kenya (including BHO I’s own mother) who swear that they witnessed the birth of BHO II while his parents visited them in Kenya. If it cannot be proven that BHO was born upon U.S. soil, this not only proves that he is not “natural born”, and thus alone constitutes a Third Strike, but also highlights the independent query of general Citizenship, b.), below.
• b. Which brings us to the question of whether BHO is even a United States Citizen as of January 9^th, 2009? Regardless of where he was actually born, he could have dual, or multiple citizenship statuses, or be of singular foreign citizenship status if such status of his could ever be proven. In other words, technically legally, BHO may be any of the following: i.) a native-born citizen of Kenya, ii.) a native-born citizen of Hawaii and a citizen of Kenya, iii.) a Citizen of Indonesia after his second Muslim father stripped his U.S. Citizenship for that of Indonesian Citizenship, and iv.) several other scenarios including one that BHO II may technically be an “illegal alien” having never been properly naturalized as a U.S. Citizen. Regardless of which of the foregoing categories BHO II falls into, his status as anything other than purely a U.S. Citizen would also independently achieve a Third Strike in this case, whether he were “natural born” or not.

Remember, since all three requirements must be proven, in order to be eligible for the Presidency, this makes it a ONE Strike and you’re disqualified situation.

In fact, if you had any trouble parsing the foregoing logic consider this:  Since BHO II’s father BHO I was indisputably not a U.S. Citizen, then BHO II cannot be natural born, and therefore, is not qualified to be POTUS – regardless of any other requirement or status!  Do you realize, that if WE allow a Usurper to occupy the Oval Office, not only will we have an Impostor issuing commands to our U.S. Military and have his finger on the red “Button”, but every piece of legislation he signs will be passed into law illegally and will be illegitimate?  Who wants to live under that Tyranny?!

Please send a letter to the Supreme Court of the United States and demand that they immediately subpoena all information from Barack Hussein Obama, and hear oral arguments on the merits of this case – Lightfoot vs. Bowen.  Time is of the essence!

Live Free or Die,       -Jefferson Paine

A person is unequivocally required by the U.S. Constitution to be a Natural Born Cititzen in order to be eligible to occupy the Office of the President of The United States (POTUS).  Usurper-elect Barack Hussein Obama refuses to produce such evidence that he is a Natural Born Citizen!      -Jefferson Paine

by -Jefferson Paine

Lady Liberty Crumbling

I’d like to take up our reader Ted’s challenge regarding the roiling controversy over Barack Hussein Obama’s (BHO) insouciant inability to provide sufficient evidence that he is duly eligible to be elected to the office of President of the United State of America (POTUS).

• Challenge, can anyone prove this wrong?:-

1. Constitution Article II requires USA President to be “natural born citizen”.

2. BHO’s website admits his dad was Kenyan/British, not American, citizen when BHO was born.

3. BHO is therefore not a “natural born citizen” (irrespective of Hawaiian birth or whether he may be a 14th Amendment “citizen” of USA) – as confirmed in the Senate’s own McCain qualification resolution agreed to by BHO.

4. Supreme Court has already docketed two upcoming conferences, 1/9/09 and 1/16/09 – between dates Congress counts electoral votes (1/8/09) and Presidential inauguration (1/20/09) – to address Berg Case and fashion relief on BHO’s eligibility to be President.

5. Since no facts are in dispute, Supreme Court rules on Summary Judgment to enjoin BHO’s inauguration as President.

6. Therefore, BHO is not inaugurated as President.

7. Vice President Elect Biden is inaugurated Acting President under the 20th Amendment to serve until new President is determined – the procedure for which determination to be set out by Congress and/or the Supreme Court so long as in conformance with the Constitution.

1)  Check.  And the question is: What exactly constitutes a “natural born Citizen”?  This is where Leftists in general, and Obama sycophants in particular, will begin to twist this thing to Hell and back via claims of ‘vagueness of definition’ and two centuries’ legislation passed regarding “naturalization” of Citizens in the U.S.  Make no mistake about it, a “natural born Citizen” is a distinct and separate issue from the naturalizing, or the making of a “naturalized” Citizen.

Critics will claim that this concept is not explicitly defined within the U.S. Constitution (along with most terms) as an excuse to define its “living, breathing” meaning to be anything they please it to mean two centuries hence.  It was reported that when the Constitution was drafted, the concept of “natural born” Citizenship was not even explicitly debated and the language was passed unanimously.  I posit that this occurred NOT because this concept was “vague” at the time, but to the contrary, such debate was utterly unnecessary because its concept was so UNDERSTOOD.  The concept of birthright Citizenship (as opposed to being “naturalized” later by some other process) was known to be naturally endowed within a newborn upon his/her birth to U.S. Citizens upon U.S. soil.

Many candidates for POTUS have had their Citizenship status heavily scrutinized as to the technical legal eligibility to run for the Presidency – from 21^st President Chester Arthur to Barry Goldwater to George Romney (Mitt’s father) to John S. McCain III (curiously, most all challenges only of Republicans.. hmm.).  The case of John McCain was recently legally settled and I did not witness even crocodile tears from those who now claim it as an illegitimate, unnecessary burden for their candidate BHO to actually prove his own eligibility.  Presidential candidate John S. McCain III was born to a U.S. Navy Admiral (himself, son to a U.S. Navy Admiral) and his wife – both U.S. Citizens – at a U.S. military base within the (then) U.S.-controlled Panama Canal Zone.

2) Yes – there is no dispute that BHO’s father was a foreigner from Kenya – which was still administered as a British colony at the date of BHO’s alleged birth. This would make Obama, Sr. a native born Kenyan, and a British colonial subject. BHO’s mother was impregnated by BHO Sr. right about the time she turned eighteen years of age, and the two were allegedly married shortly thereafter prior to BHO Jr.’s birth. The first question is WHERE was BHO born?

I have seen no legitimate proof, yet, that BHO was born on U.S. soil in Hawaii.  Even if he had, would his paternal lineage take precedence over his eighteen-year-old mother’s -she who had just recently married this foreigner?  (and if she quite possibly conceived BHO as a minor?)  Did she ever renounce her U.S. Citizenship during this process (as with her second Muslim husband, who took BHO back to live with him as an Indonesian Citizen)?  Does dual citizenship, or perhaps single, foreign citizenship, through his father(s), negate U.S. “native born” status – our Founding Fathers certainly set up this strict requirement in order to eliminate the possibility of foreign loyalties of the POTUS – “dual citizenship” or ANY other loyalty other than solely to the United States of America.  I think BHO’s Constitutional argument to be made here (assuming a legitimate one could be made), is whether BHO can be deemed “natural born” to a mother who was presumably a U.S. Citizen, marrying a foreign national, and passes the test without any real proof of birthing her son upon American soil.

BHO’s handlers offer up a “Certification of Live Birth” (digitally, via the Internet) issued by the State of Hawaii, as supposed legal “proof” that he is a natural born Citizen.  The fatal problem here is that this IS NOT A BIRTH CERTIFICATE! – and, therefore, proves NOTHING.  A genuine, legal “Birth Certificate” states the exact location of birth (the actual hospital and where it is located), the exact time and date, vital statistics of the newborn, identities and status of his parents, the real names of the actual delivering doctor(s) and/or nurses involved in the birth – and the document (and therefore the details contained therein) can be AUTHENTICATED.  The only document the Obama Campaign continues to proffer, the “Certification”, satisfies none of these requirements of proof.

Not only can this Hawaiian “birth” be literally phoned in (just as the newspaper announcement was made) and the State subsequently regurgitates a vague, computer print-out of “Certification”, but the actual “certification” that his Campaign has put forth on the Internet has been deemed an obvious forgery by more than one document expert.

Read the rest of this entry »