What's the real agenda?
NC sez: We all know, that out of no where, faux bama shows up, and wins a presidential election. We all know that he hung out and was trained by marxists like Frank Marshall Davis, Bill, terrorist, Ayers, and his so called Black “Liberation” theologian, and Marxist pastor, Jeremiah Wright.
So why is it so hard to believe that he holds fast to marxist ideals? In the past, I did a few articles comparing faux bama’s “BluePrint Plan to change America” with the Communist Manisfesto which provided more prove of his intentions.
All of this is mounting evidence that the obamunist, and his ilk, are intentionally trying to destroy this country. It’s no secret that obamunists create a crisis and victims of that crisis so they can pretend like they have the solution. The real agenda is to destroy those who create jobs, who grow economies, which make nations great.
Listen to faux-bama’s words, look at his behavior, and look at the behavior of his fellow traitors also known as congress critters. I can guarantee you that our economy will get worse throughout his usurpation. There will be more control over you as an individual. What I will never get is why anyone individual would want to be control by a gub’ment. I will never understand that. Even bums don’t want to be controlled, they just want the hands out!
Can America and her uniqueness survive this war for control over the individual? Yes, she can IF her people decide to face reality and fight back! Read this piece and decide for yourself if this is not happening as we speak! Leaders in the communist party, way back when, said they would take over this country without firing a shot. Have they? Did they do what they said they would do? Why would they want to destroy America? Because they HATE freedom and individuality, and they love control and willing their power over others. Is this what you want?
Discover the Networks
First proposed in 1966 and named after Columbia University sociologists Richard Andrew Cloward and Frances Fox Piven, the “Cloward-Piven Strategy” seeks to hasten the fall of capitalism by overloading the government bureaucracy with a flood of impossible demands, thus pushing society into crisis and economic collapse.
NC Asks: Why do theses socialists hate capitalism so much? Because of free markets more people have been freed from slavery and poverty than haven’t been freed. All you have to do is compare the free market system to the socialist economic system and you will see with your own eyes who creates freedom for people and which system does not! Why do commies INSIST that free markets create slavery? Read on.
Inspired by the August 1965 riots in the black district of Watts in Los Angeles (which erupted after police had used batons to subdue a black man suspected of drunk driving), Cloward and Piven published an article titled “The Weight of the Poor: A Strategy to End Poverty” in the May 2, 1966 issue of The Nation. Following its publication, The Nation sold an unprecedented 30,000 reprints. Activists were abuzz over the so-called “crisis strategy” or “Cloward-Piven Strategy,” as it came to be called. Many were eager to put it into effect.
NC sez: See, there is nothing new in the tactics of people like al-Gore and the faux bama. They create crisis and a ploy, a tactic, a strategy to destroy this country. I see al-Gore isn’t hampered by poverty, or even a middle class life style yet he sure doesn’t want YOU to achieve! Why is that? Remember what that freak Michael Moore said, “You can’t handle being wealthy!”
In their 1966 article, Cloward and Piven charged that the ruling classes (NC points out: the commie word for those who are rich and create jobs for others.) used welfare to weaken the poor; (NC sez: When the commies say that those who are rich and create jobs weakens the poor they are dead right on. Why? because then there are less poor and less evidence that a communist economic system works, and boy they can’t have that on their lying hands) actually that by providing a social safety net, the rich doused the fires of rebellion. Poor people can advance only when “the rest of society is afraid of them,” Cloward told The New York Times on September 27, 1970. Rather than placating the poor with government hand-outs, wrote Cloward and Piven, activists should work to sabotage and destroy the welfare system; the collapse of the welfare state would ignite a political and financial crisis that would rock the nation; poor people would rise in revolt; only then would “the rest of society” accept their demands.
NC points out: We see this part of the plan hasn’t worked. We have big bubby handouts more than ever these days!
The key to sparking this rebellion would be to expose the inadequacy of the welfare state. Cloward-Piven’s early promoters cited radical organizer Saul Alinsky as their inspiration. “Make the enemy live up to their (sic) own book of rules,” Alinsky wrote in his 1972 book Rules for Radicals. When pressed to honor every word of every law and statute, every Judaeo-Christian moral tenet, and every implicit promise of the liberal social contract, human agencies inevitably fall short. The system’s failure to “live up” to its rule book can then be used to discredit it altogether, and to replace the capitalist “rule book” with a socialist one.
NC points out: Every time you hear a liberal expect perfection out of another human being this is where they’re getting their tactics from! My question is this: Why does the commies think they can live up to their own rule book? It’s only logic that if you tax people out of work then who is going to pay for all of this crap? Since we already know from world history that a commie economic system doesn’t work then this plan really is about an elitist group plundering the treasury and having power which will lead to mass death. It happens every time. Is that freedom? It’s laughable!
The authors noted that the number of Americans subsisting on welfare — about 8 million, at the time — probably represented less than half the number who were technically eligible for full benefits. They proposed a “massive drive to recruit the poor onto the welfare rolls.” Cloward and Piven calculated that persuading even a fraction of potential welfare recipients to demand their entitlements would bankrupt the system. The result, they predicted, would be “a profound financial and political crisis” that would unleash “powerful forces … for major economic reform at the national level.”
NC asks: What is this major economic reform that they want to unleash at the national level?
Their article called for “cadres of aggressive organizers” to use “demonstrations to create a climate of militancy.” Intimidated by threats of black violence, politicians would appeal to the federal government for help. Carefully orchestrated media campaigns, carried out by friendly, leftwing journalists, would float the idea of “a federal program of income redistribution,” in the form of a guaranteed living income for all — working and non-working people alike. Local officials would clutch at this idea like drowning men to a lifeline. They would apply pressure on Washington to implement it. With every major city erupting into chaos, Washington would have to act.
NC sez: Ask yourself why would anyone want people to be equal in their income levels instead of encouraging a system that allows people the freedom to gain as much wealth as possible in their lives for the lives of their posterity? Why are these communists afraid of economic freedom?
This was an example of what are commonly called Trojan Horse movements — mass movements whose outward purpose seems to be providing material help to the downtrodden, but whose real objective is to draft poor people into service as revolutionary foot soldiers; to mobilize poor people en masse to overwhelm government agencies with a flood of demands beyond the capacity of those agencies to meet. The flood of demands was calculated to break the budget, jam the bureaucratic gears into gridlock, and bring the system crashing down. Fear, turmoil, violence and economic collapse would accompany such a breakdown — providing perfect conditions for fostering radical change. That was the theory.
NC Asks: Again, what is this radical change they want to force?
Cloward and Piven recruited a militant black organizer named George Wiley to lead their new movement. In the summer of 1967, Wiley founded the National Welfare Rights Organization (NWRO). His tactics closely followed the recommendations set out in Cloward and Piven’s article. His followers invaded welfare offices across the United States — often violently — bullying social workers and loudly demanding every penny to which the law “entitled” them. By 1969, NWRO claimed a dues-paying membership of 22,500 families, with 523 chapters across the nation.
NC states: A welfare union, with all the thuggish tactics of a labor union but for the lazy!
Regarding Wiley’s tactics, The New York Times commented on September 27, 1970, “There have been sit-ins in legislative chambers, including a United States Senate committee hearing, mass demonstrations of several thousand welfare recipients, school boycotts, picket lines, mounted police, tear gas, arrests – and, on occasion, rock-throwing, smashed glass doors, overturned desks, scattered papers and ripped-out phones.”These methods proved effective. “The flooding succeeded beyond Wiley’s wildest dreams,” writes Sol Stern in the City Journal. ”From 1965 to 1974, the number of single-parent households on welfare soared from 4.3 million to 10.8 million, despite mostly flush economic times. By the early 1970s, one person was on the welfare rolls in New York City for every two working in the city’s private economy.“As a direct result of its massive welfare spending, New York City was forced to declare bankruptcy in 1975. The entire state of New York nearly went down with it. The Cloward-Piven strategy had proved its effectiveness.
The Cloward-Piven strategy depended on surprise. Once society recovered from the initial shock, the backlash began. New York’s welfare crisis horrified America, giving rise to a reform movement which culminated in “the end of welfare as we know it” — the 1996 Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act, which imposed time limits on federal welfare, along with strict eligibility and work requirements. Both Cloward and Piven attended the White House signing of the bill as guests of President Clinton.
Most Americans to this day have never heard of Cloward and Piven. But New York City Mayor Rudolph Giuliani attempted to expose them in the late 1990s. As his drive for welfare reform gained momentum, Giuliani accused the militant scholars by name, citing their 1966 manifesto as evidence that they had engaged in deliberate economic sabotage. “This wasn’t an accident,” Giuliani charged in a 1997 speech. “It wasn’t an atmospheric thing, it wasn’t supernatural. This is the result of policies and programs designed to have the maximum number of people get on welfare.”
Cloward and Piven never again revealed their intentions as candidly as they had in their 1966 article. Even so, their activism in subsequent years continued to rely on the tactic of overloading the system. When the public caught on to their welfare scheme, Cloward and Piven simply moved on, applying pressure to other sectors of the bureaucracy, wherever they detected weakness.
NC points out: And to this day, we see this same tactic being applied to other issues like militant homosexuality, death cult ideologies like abortion, infanticide, elderly and handicap “death with dignity” lies! This is all designed to weed out the population, get rid of people, less strain on the commie economic system.
In 1982, partisans of the Cloward-Piven strategy founded a new “voting rights movement,” which purported to take up the unfinished work of the Voting Rights Act of 1965. Like ACORN, the organization that spear-headed this campaign, the new “voting rights” movement was led by veterans of George Wiley’s welfare rights crusade. Its flagship organizations were Project Vote and Human SERVE, both founded in 1982. Project Vote is an ACORN front group, launched by former NWRO organizer and ACORN co-founder Zach Polett. Human SERVE was founded by Richard A. Cloward and Frances Fox Piven, along with a former NWRO organizer named Hulbert James.
NC ponders: Yep, now this tactic is to create a crisis, but the hidden agenda, really, is to keep blacks on the plantation–in a modern sense of course, keep that confrontation going, keep the lie, “that you are a victim of the big bad WHITE rich oppressor.” Gee, if we took these same people, taught them how wonderful they are, and that they have their own gifts and talents and that they possess everything in them to succeed, how long would the big bubby programs last? How long would it be that the out of control gub’ment would no longer be needed? Oh my gosh, we can’t have that now can we?
All three of these organizations — ACORN, Project Vote and Human SERVE — set to work lobbying energetically for the so-called Motor-Voter law, which Bill Clinton ultimately signed in 1993. The Motor-Voter bill is largely responsible for swamping the voter rolls with “dead wood” — invalid registrations signed in the name of deceased, ineligible or non-existent people -- (NC reminds: Don’t forget dogs too! After all, dogs are people too!) thus opening the door to the unprecedented levels of voter fraud and “voter disenfranchisement” claims that followed in subsequent elections.
NC points out: And this is why our elections can no longer be trusted anymore, this and black box voting. I truly believe that almost every election since this disgusting piece of legislation was enacted that the elections are a sham. An entire investigation has to be launched on every voting district in America. Anyone responsible for illegal elections should be imprisoned for life without parole for the devastation that has been caused to the taxpayer’s treasury. If people like Made-Off can go to prison for life for the ponzi schemes he perpetrated then so can anyone who has stolen elections and the devastations it has caused to America!
The new “voting rights” coalition combines mass voter registration drives -- typically featuring high levels of fraud -- with systematic intimidation of election officials in the form of frivolous lawsuits, unfounded charges of “racism” and “disenfranchisement,” and “direct action” (street protests, violent or otherwise). (NC reminds: remember the black ACORN thugs wielding clubs to intimidated voters in Philly last November. You can see that video in my vodpod located in the sidebar) Just as they swamped America’s welfare offices in the 1960s, Cloward-Piven devotees now seek to overwhelm the nation’s understaffed and poorly policed electoral system. Their tactics set the stage for the Florida recount crisis of 2000, and have introduced a level of fear, tension and foreboding to U.S. elections heretofore encountered mainly in Third World countries.
Both the Living Wage and Voting Rights movements depend heavily on financial support from George Soros’s Open Society Institute and his “Shadow Party,” through whose support the Cloward-Piven strategy continues to provide a blueprint for some of the Left’s most ambitious campaigns.
NC points out: Today, Soros is shorting America’s economy and instigating electronic bank runs. Something he also accomplished recently in Britain. The bottom line is this: communists hate individuality and freedom! If YOU think you can make it on your own then what is the need for gub’ment? Just like we will always have poverty on planet earth, we will always have those who want to will their power over us! We have to be diligent. We have to WANT to water the Tree of Liberty with THEIR blood. The are haters of humanity. They are haters of freedom and life. You and I have no need for them because we possess everything within us to make our own lives work with NO HELP from big bubby! That is the one thing the marxist swine are so desperately afraid of–individuality and freedom and faith in YHVH rather in a marxist totalitarian state! I can guarantee you, that if we took these so called poor, disenfranchised, oppressed people, and taught them they possessed everything within them to succeed, they would be so fired up, and angry that they were used by power-trippers that they would start a revolution, alright! The commies don’t want that truth out, I can guar-an-DAMN-tee ya!
“Give Me Liberty or Give Me Death!”
“Arbeit macht frei” is a German phrase meaning “work brings freedom” or “work shall set you free/will free you”
Readers Say: