An Early Christmas Present; Thank you Barry
Friends, it is time to wake up before it is too late. Each one of us needs to get the word out as fast as we can and expose what this Administration, the OIC and the United Nations would like to have happen in America.
And while you are there please sign the petition to help stop this madness at Help Stop the Madness!
The draft Treaty of Copenhagen, to be signed in mid-December 2009, would create an unelected world government with direct power over all financial and trading markets, and direct power to intervene over the heads of elected governments in the economic and environmental affairs of all nations that sign the Treaty. The word “government” actually appears in the Treaty as the first of three purposes of a huge, new, supranational bureaucratic entity that will have the power to require wealthier nations to redistribute up to 2% of their annual gross domestic product to third-world countries in imagined reparation for imaginary “climate debt” – and all this just as final scientific proof that CO2 has a tiny and harmless warming effect is available. Please sign the Instrument of Repudiation, and urge at least five of your friends to sign it too, and urge each of them to find five more to sign it. The Instrument will be tabled during the Copenhagen Conference this December.
Do not be deceived by this administration any longer. Please wake up before the little freedoms we have left are gone.
Little children, make sure no one deceives you; the one who practices righteousness is righteous, just as He is righteous; the one who practices sin is of the devil; for the devil has sinned from the beginning. The Son of God appeared for this purpose, to destroy the works of the devil.
(1 John 3:7-8 NASB)
Source
Dale Hurd.
“Is ‘Islamophobia’ a Worldwide Free Speech Threat?.” CBN News, September 24, 2009, sec. World News.
Eugene Volokh.
“Is the Obama Administration Supporting Calls to Outlaw Supposed Hate Speech?.” The Huffington Post, October 1, 2009, sec. World News.
Frank Jordans.
“UN rights body approves US-Egypt free speech text.” The Associated Press, October 2, 2009.
Killing of Non-Muslims is Legitimate (British Mullah), 2006. YouTube.com
Laolu Akande.
“U.S. To Partner OIC, As Obama Welcomes Ramadan Fasting Period.” OnlineNigeria.com, August 23, 2009.
Robert Spencer.
“U.S. co-sponsors anti-free speech resolution at the UN.” Jihad Watch, October 3, 2009, sec. Free speech.
In yet another attempt by the Obama Administration, with the silent help of congress (cowards) , our freedom of speech has never been more at risk at being lost than it is right now.
Why? Because while Americans were sipping back on a cold tall one, watching baseball and eating popcorn, the enemies were hard at work within our nation; diligently striving to remove the very freedoms we Americas have neglected for far too long.
For the first time since the signing of our Declaration of Independence we are now heading directly back into the stone age, to square one; with persecution and tyranny if we dare speak out against the powers that be.
The powers like the OIC, who Obama has stated that he wants to partner with.
Wants to silence any negative remarks against Islam
Wants to enforce strict Sharia Law under the Cairo Declaration.
Is the collective voice of the Muslims world.
The U.N. Human Rights Council approved the resolution, cosponsored by the U.S. and Egypt, yesterday.
It calls on states to condemn and criminalize “any advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence.” It also condemns “negative stereotyping of religions and racial groups,” which is of course an oblique reference to accurate reporting about thejihad doctrine and Islamic supremacism — which is always the focus of whining by the Organization of the Islamic Conference and other groups about negative “stereotyping” of Islam. They never say anything when people like Osama bin Laden and Khaled Sheikh Mohammed issue detailed Koranic expositions justifying violence and hatred; but when people like Geert Wilders and others report about such expositions, that’s “negative stereotyping.”
And the worst aspect of this and all such measures is that the “Incitement” and the “hatred” are in the eye of the beholder. The powerful can decide to silence the powerless by classifying their views as hate speech. The Founding Fathers tried to protect Americans from tyranny by protecting free speech. Now our free speech is threatened, and tyranny will take advantage of that. — Jihad watch
Why on earth would Obama ever do something so anti-American? Well, that is an easy one, because, by the actions he takes, he clearly shows that he hates America and needs it to CHANGE, CHANGE to the ways of Islam-Marxism, all in the name of reaching out to your friendly neighborhood radical that want your mouth sewn shut.
American diplomats say the measure — co-sponsored by Egypt — is part of the Obama administration’s effort to reach out to Muslim countries.
“Egypt’s cosponsorship of the resolution on freedom of expression is not the result of a real commitment to upholding freedom of expression,” said Jeremie Smith, Geneva director of the Cairo Institute for Human Rights Studies.
“If this were the case, freedom of expression would not be systematically violated on a daily basis in Egypt,” he said.
Others warned that the resolution appears to protect religions rather than believers and encourages journalists to abide by ill-defined codes of conduct.
“Unfortunately, the text talks about negative racial and religious stereotyping, something which most free expression and human rights organizations will oppose,” said Agnes Callamard, executive director of London-based group Article 19.
Sewn shut for anyone who speaks out against tyranny and evil. How that for appeasement, or should I say CHANGE?
Seems like these days we just keep adding so-called hate crime laws towards anyone who speaks out against Islam, but as long as you are a Muslim, no worries, preach all the hate your peaceful beautiful heart desires towards those fitly dirty Americans, Christians and Jews until your completely content. I mean after all isn’t this what Islam teaches, hate towards anyone who is not a Muslim?
Of course it does as stated by the British Imam Mr. Anjum Chaudri .
Don’t you love the religion of peace, or do they just love chopping block square?
I mean after all, when Allah said to smite them at the neck, he wasn’t kidding.
Introduction to Surah 47. Muhammad or Al-Qitâl
4. So, when you meet (in fight Jihâd in Allâh’s Cause), those who disbelieve smite at their necks till when you have killed and wounded many of them, then bind a bond firmly (on them, i.e. take them as captives). ..Thus [you are ordered by Allâh to continue in carrying out Jihâd against the disbelievers till they embrace Islâm…
Oh vey, there I go again showing the hate they speak and exposing their evil ways, but according to the new wonderful proposed resolution, this would be classified as hate speech even though it puts Islam in its true light, I mean negative light, no I mean true.
I know, I hear everyone telling me, Mr. Turner we have the second amendment, and this will never happen in America! Really? You might have a piece of paper with words on it, but if Obama and the United Nations have their way, that piece of paper might as well be throw into the fireplace and used to warm your house on a cold winters night as it would become worthless in protecting the free speech of Americans in the New World Politics.
6. But why the fuss, some might ask, if we’re protected by the First Amendment? First, if the U.S. backs a resolution that urges the suppression of some speech, presumably we are taking the view that all countries — including the U.S. — should adhere to this resolution. If we are constitutionally barred from adhering to it by our domestic constitution, then we’re implicitly criticizing that constitution, and committing ourselves to do what we can to change it.
So to be consistent with our position here, the Administration would presumably have to take what steps it can to ensure that supposed “hate speech” that incites hostility will indeed be punished. It would presumably be committed to filing amicus briefs supporting changes in First Amendment law to allow such punishment, and in principle perhaps the appointment of Justices who would endorse such changes (or even the proposal of express constitutional amendments that would work such changes).
So the question is, is it too late to do anything?
It really depends on you. Are we as a nation more interested in our jobs, cars and boats rather than the freedoms of others, the freedom of speech? Is the me generation to wrapped up in themselves to care about anyone else except themselves? If they answer is yes to either of those question, then I am going to find a cave somewhere and sit this one out, just kidding, I mean jail cell somewhere, because this American is not going to lie down and watch our freedoms being stripped away. Our freedom of speech is most important freedom we have. Free speech is extremely more important than popcorn, baseball and beer; truly I mean it, if we defend this freedom then we keep them all. If we lose this one, then you know how it plays out, just look to the Middle East where Islam flourishes.
You know, I went to bed one night before the elections and I still haven’t woken up. This dream called CHANGE is a real dozy and all I can ask is this; what you going to do when the Taliban come for you? If your answer just happens to be to sit at home in silence, that isn’t going to fix this one this time….
And to leave you with one more thought let’s hear Mr. Pat Condell let it rip.
Make no joke about it, when Zakaria Botros speaks, he means business.
Mr. Botros speaks from experience as he lives and breathes the tyranny of Islam daily; I mean after all he didn’t get the title, “Public Enemy #1” in the Islamic world for nothing.
Ok, I see, so if you tell the truth about what they believe without fear, without compromise, then I guess that puts you on the most wanted list, especially if others leave Islam for another religion like say Christianity?
Unless, that freedom of speech puts Islam in any kind of negative light; weird how tolerance works for one group of people, but not another. It almost sounds like intolerance towards everything except Islam, but hey what do I know, I am just an ignorant westerner.
On a lighter note, I would like to give a SHOUT out to the Obama House, located near Capitol Hill where they just had the Islamic Day of Prayer.
And while we are speaking of the Islamic Day of Prayer that took place on our nation’s capitol, shall we watch some footage of the days events?
America, are you starting to get it; is it finally starting to sink in? If it isn’t, then we better wake up very quickly and pull our heads from the sands in which they are buried, or Sharia will be knocking at our doors demanding each of us to embrace Islam, or, how can I say this gently, have your, “head cut off“.
Yes, in 2009 people are still being beheaded in Islamic countries for no other reason than being a person of different faith, especially if those people are of the Christian faith. You know the faith that America was founded on, a faith where recently a team of, “Christian Orphanage Workers”, in an Islamic country were executed for simply refusing to accept the peaceful beautiful tolerant ways of Islam .
I know, I can hear you all say; Jim, dude, this is America, and this will never happen here. There isn’t a single person of the Islamic faith that would ever want Sharia Law in this country, or Islam as the only religion in America.
And of course I would have to respond with the elegant words so eloquently spoken by the founder of CAIR, “Islam isn’t in America to be equal to any other faith, but to become dominant,” and, “The Koran, the Muslim book of scripture, should be the highest authority in America, and Islam the only accepted religion on Earth.”
Yup, there goes that tolerance again, refreshing isn’t it? My favorite part on tolerance is how the Koran should be the highest authority in America and Islam the only religion on Earth. Unfortunately there might be just one issues with that statement, just thinking out loud here for second of course, is that if the Koran is religious then how could it become the law of the land especially with that little pesky separation of Church and State clause that we have here in America. You know the same clause that will not allow Christmas carols to be sung in school, the same clause that forbids the mention of God or prayer at certain events, yet the Koran as the highest authority in America?
Again only thinking out loud here, but maybe Islam isn’t only just a religion after all, maybe it is both a political system and a religion rolled into one?
Of course not, what was I thinking? For that to be the case, you would need someone elected to office in the branch of the government as some type of community organizer in order to be a political entity.
I mean come on, when have you ever heard of a Special Representative for Christians; remember the separation of Church and State thing?
Source
ACT catches Sheikh Gilani extremist in a series of lies at Muslim Prayer Day Washington, DC, 2009. http://www.youtube.com
“AMERICA: CHRISTIAN NATION OR ISLAMIC BACKWATER?.”
The Last Crusade, October 5, 2009. http://thelastcrusade.org
Andrew G. Bostom. “FrontPage Magazine – The Sacred Muslim Practice of Beheading.”
FrontPage Magazine, May 13, 2004. FrontPage.com
Art Moore. “Did CAIR founder say Islam to rule America?.”
WorldNetDaily, December 11, 2006. http://www.wnd.com
Dale Hurd. “Is ‘Islamophobia’ a Worldwide Free Speech Threat?.”
CBN News, September 24, 2009, sec. World News. http://www.cbn.com
Heather Maher. “U.S. Confirms First Special Representative To Muslim Communities.”
Radio Free Europe, September 16, 2009. http://www.rferl.org
Jim Turner. “Islam on Capitol Hill, NO, oh YES!.”
The Chronicle Watch, September 20, 2009, sec. News / US / Islam. http://www.chroniclewatch.com
Joe Berkofsky. “Was Berg targeted as a Jew? | JTA – Jewish & Israel News.”
JTA, November 30, 1999. http://jta.org/
Raymond Ibrahim. “Islam’s ‘Public Enemy #1’ by Raymond Ibrahim on National Review Online.”
National Review Online, March 25, 2008. http://article.nationalreview.com
This time, instead of writing, the team here at The Chronicle Watch decided to put words into video in order to help better express the concerns that were raised during Obama’s speech.
While there are many issues found in Obamas speech, we are going to address only a handful at this time.
As discussed earlier in an article titled, Mr. Obama is a Christian, we need to continue to ask a simple question.
Why would a self professed Christian recite the Shahada, the Muslims call to faith in perfect Arabic, when the recital makes one a Muslim according to Islamic teachings?
Communities
As we listen to the words of Mr. Obama we hear him bring up the word community time and time again, and now, all of a sudden, we see that the State Department, for the first time ever, appointed a Special Representative to Muslim Communities within the United States.
The question is, is this really the first time that Mr. Obama tried to have Islam breach the White House?
The answer is NO.
In 2008 Mr. Obama appointed a man by the name of Mazen Asbahi as his emissary to the Muslim Communities in the United States. The issue is that this man, Mazen Asbahi, has ties to the Islamic Society of North America which was an unindicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land Foundation case; the Holy Land Foundation is allegedly a front group for the terror organization Hamas.
After this was found out about, Mr. Asbahi, the new community leader resigned in order to, “avoid distracting from Barack Obama’s message of change.” [ 1 ]
Organization of the Islamic Conference ( OIC)
Continuing on with the speech he delivered, we heard Mr. Obama express how, “we are moving forward to partner with the OIC”.
The question is, who is the OIC?
The Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC) is the second largest inter-governmental organization after the United Nations which has membership of 57 states spread over four continents. The Organization is the collective voice of the Muslim world and ensuring to safeguard and protect the interests of the Muslim world in the spirit of promoting international peace and harmony among various people of the world. [ 2 ]
It seems that from what is expressed on the OIC website, that they are the second largest organization in the world after the United Nations, and that they are the collective voice of the Muslim world.
The next question we have is, what voice are they interested in expressing?
In 2007, OIC Secretary General Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu, widely considered to be a “moderate” Muslim professor from Turkey, used the UN’s “International Day of Tolerance” to assert that freedom of speech was unacceptable if it was used to criticize Islam. [ 3 ]
Then in 2008 this sentiment was expressed yet again.
“In 2008, the Organization of the Islamic Conference laid out a 10-year plan for suppression of free speech and for the introduction of laws that would prevent criticisms of religions and the reading of Islam…” [ 4 ]
According to the words expressed on the OIC website they claim to be the collective voice of the Muslim world; a voice according to the Cairo Declaration where rights and freedoms are stipulated under strict Islamic law.
The OIC calls itself the collective voice of the world-wide Muslim “ummah,” or nation. It has its own declaration of human rights, called the Cairo Declaration.
The document states “All rights and freedoms stipulated in this Declaration are subject to the Islamic Shari’ah,” which is strict Islamic law. [ 5 ]
Another alarming issue is what they, the OIC, consider terrorism. A act so terrorizing that it is a threat to world peace.
Marshall Sana, an Islamic expert at Barnabas Fund, said the OIC “actually wields an enormous amount of influence.”
“That’s been evident the last few years with perhaps its number one agenda item, which is combating ‘Islamophobia‘ as they call it, or the defamation of religion,” he added.
The OIC calls Islamophobia “the worst form of terrorism” and a threat to world peace. [ 6 ]
Final Thoughts
As we see alignments like never before being made by this administration the question remains, “how can an American President knowing the views and ties within these organization wish to partner with them”?
Why would a president of any nation align themselves with countries that have never been considered friends of the nation in which they rule?
Maybe the answer is that this President is really after a CHANGE; a changethat comes under the guise of Islamic law.
Readers Say: