Hat Tip Eric

Government mandated healthcare IS NOT about the love that the government has for its People. It’s about controlling how many people will live in the Country. In other words, if you believe that the world has to many people living on it (which the Progressive, Liberal Socialist Democrats believe in) then institute mandated government healthcare, and there is a guarantee that many people will die! Less people to “care” for means more money for the government! Wake up, People! Mandated government healthcare is dangerous for those who actually want to live! Just say no!

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H4u5x9XAsAs]

Yes – they escaped the disposable forceps and the suction hose, and now the surviving Youngest Generation are beginning to seek justice!

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0OFOy29nNIo]

Don’t let anyone fool you into believing that Hillary Clinton is the odds on favorite to win the Presidency in 2008. To the contrary, the next heir to the Oval Office is the GOP’s to lose. The following is my case.

Undoubtedly, Mrs. Clinton will win the Democrat nomination for POTUS – in effect, she’s already won. How can I be so confident? Because she’s got the one thing that no other Democrat running has – the brand name ‘Clinton’ – and it simply cannot be overcome on the Left. Their base sees this “two-fer” as more than enough to win – and Democrats are desperate to win the Presidency.

Witness the phenomenon of John Forbes Kerry, Vietnam War hero. Remember when he strutted victorious from the Iowa caucus in 2004, whipping out his uneasy, crooked salute? Without knowing hardly anything about him, like dominoes the Democrat rank and file robotically fell into line until he had the party’s nomination quickly wrapped up.

But, as we know, his Presidential bid was ill-fated as Democrat dreams fell prey again to his arch-nemesis, and utterly incompetent George W. Bush. Why did Democrats so blindly put up such a lame contender? Here’s the dirty little secret: It’s because Democrats are not very discerning about their candidate, because just about anyone can be anointed as their Thief-in-Chief. On the Left, where fascistic group-think makes it easy to control their base, all that is needed from the candidate is simply hardcore pandering, grand promises of free goodies, and a reason to jump en masse on the anointed Democrat’s magic carpet ride all the way to those verdant White House grounds. Kerry fit the bill early, and the ‘Anyone-but-Bush’ automatons got in behind him lightning-quick and never let go, despite his sophomoric rival’s ‘Don’t-mess-with-Texas’ campaign.

Read the rest of this entry »

ADVERTISEMENT FOR WASHINGTON STATE

If you’re tired of paying lots of taxes for your street bums, perpetual welfare mothers, professional students, illegals, unemployable drop outs, and sex predators, then encourage them to move to Washington state!

We’ll take care of ‘em, and by the time they have taken advantage of every welfare program the state, county, and city government offers, they will be making about the same amount of money the average tax payers do who pay for these bloated programs.

Read the rest of this entry »

Remember those rumors we use to hear about re: Hill’s sexual orientation while Billary occupied the WH? Well it seems those rumors are finally coming home to roost. It appears that a super big story may hit the air waves soon exposing Hillary’s sexual orientation. It’s about time! The LA Times is sitting on proof of this little known DC secret, but they are not reporting it because they are scared about the repercussions. Last time I was in journalism school, which was a zillion years ago, we were taught to report the facts, not sit on facts cuz we were fraidie cats. I guess Times have changed. No pun intended!

Aahh, heck, it doesn’t matter if Hill gets outed by a gay sex scandal. The Modern Progressives don’t care about that. It’s only scandalous if you’re a Republican gay! So the LA Times have nothing to concern their little empty heads about!

UPDATE I: The libs are all upset about this latest report. I’m confused why when it’s their very own gays who are outing Hill. What’s the prob?

UPDATE II: For balance sake, I provide this link , however, we’re suppose to trust the fifth column now? Don’t forsake reading the comments, too. They’re pretty funny!

~~~

The Commie rag Village Voice reported last August:

As I recently said on MONICA CROWLEY’s radio show, whisper campaigns are claiming that HILLARY CLINTON is GAYLE KING–ing her aide de camp, the glamorous HUMA ABEDIN, an Indian/Pakistani goddess from Kalamazoo, Michigan. In other words, Hillary may be putting Huma out there in the press and purposely making her more visible as a pre-emptive strike that amounts to her hiding in plain sight. This way, no Republican can later say, “Who is this gorgeous babe who spends so much intimate time with Hillary that the Observer called her Hill’s ‘body person’? Was GENNIFER FLOWERS’s book right about Hillary’s sexual taste?” And does either of this couple have the balls to bottom?

Read the rest of this entry »

The Chinese Re-Connection

by INVESTORS BUSINESS DAILY | Posted Friday, October 26, 2007 4:20 PM PT

National Security: Bill Clinton was the best president the People’s Republic of China ever had. His wife may be even better. Beijing, hungry for more technology transfers, is betting on it.

IBD Series: To China With Love: The Clinton Legacy

It’s no coincidence that Sen. Hillary Clinton’s autobiography, “Living History,” is the most popular foreign political memoir in Chinese history. The state-owned publisher of the Chinese translation of her book has printed hundreds of thousands of copies (after censoring passing references to dissident Harry Wu) and stocked them in bookstore windows from Beijing to Shanghai.

Read the rest of this entry »

Here are two links connecting RG’s connection with the NAU/ NAFTA Super Highway:

http://www.renewamerica.us/columns/grassi/070504

http://www.newswithviews.com/Kincaid/cliff149.htm

Currently, there is a crusade going on in the Republican party which I call, F.U.D., Fear, Uncertainty and Disinformation aimed squarely at the Christian Conservatives. The “Leaders” within the Republican party, are concerned that those of us who fall into the Religious Right camp of this party will not vote for the dream boy (girl?) if he is nominated.

Why do these so called Republican leaders even care how us Evangelicals will vote? Most of the time they call us derogatory names e.g. the radical right, homophobes, and bigoted racists, and dismiss us as just the far right loons. So why do they care NOW how we vote? Rudy doesn’t seem to be concerned about Christian Conservatives voting for him and he appears quite confident that he can win without us given his recent statements.

Read the rest of this entry »

Isn’t this so Presidential looking?

Recently, Judy Rudiani stated that he wouldn’t kow-tow to the Religious Right. He seems to not have a problem kow-towing to the Secular Left. It is insanity for any presidential candidate to blow off the Christian voter. Even the Dems pander to the Religious Right because they know the importance of that voting block.

So this is my prediction: If Rudy gets the nomination (Which I think he will) RUDY WILL LOSE AND HILLARY WILL WIN the Presidency because either Rudy is stupid by blowing off the Christian voter or he is a Machiavellian hypocrite, who really believes he will gain more votes from the Hillary camp than he will lose from the Christian camp OR he is both. So logically there is a 2/3rds probability of him being stupid and thus losing.

Read the rest of this entry »

Wow – shady Chinese characters funneling huge sums of dirty money into the coffers of the Clinton War Machine?

Where have we heard of this before?…