No Compromise Media

U.S. Sovereignty, the U.N. and You.

Freedom of Speech under attack; so do something…

by Mr. H

An Early Christmas Present; Thank you Barry
Friends, it is time to wake up before it is too late. Each one of us needs to get the word out as fast as we can and expose what this Administration, the OIC and the United Nations would like to have happen in America.

For more information please visit www.webcommentary.com.

And while you are there please sign the petition to help stop this madness at Help Stop the Madness!

The draft Treaty of Copenhagen, to be signed in mid-December 2009, would create an unelected world government with direct power over all financial and trading markets, and direct power to intervene over the heads of elected governments in the economic and environmental affairs of all nations that sign the Treaty. The word “government” actually appears in the Treaty as the first of three purposes of a huge, new, supranational bureaucratic entity that will have the power to require wealthier nations to redistribute up to 2% of their annual gross domestic product to third-world countries in imagined reparation for imaginary “climate debt” – and all this just as final scientific proof that CO2 has a tiny and harmless warming effect is available. Please sign the Instrument of Repudiation, and urge at least five of your friends to sign it too, and urge each of them to find five more to sign it. The Instrument will be tabled during the Copenhagen Conference this December.

Do not be deceived by this administration any longer. Please wake up before the little freedoms we have left are gone.

Little children, make sure no one deceives you; the one who practices righteousness is righteous, just as He is righteous; the one who practices sin is of the devil; for the devil has sinned from the beginning. The Son of God appeared for this purpose, to destroy the works of the devil.

(1 John 3:7-8 NASB)

Source

Dale Hurd.
“Is ‘Islamophobia’ a Worldwide Free Speech Threat?.”
CBN News, September 24, 2009, sec. World News.

Eugene Volokh.
“Is the Obama Administration Supporting Calls to Outlaw Supposed Hate Speech?.”
The Huffington Post, October 1, 2009, sec. World News.

Frank Jordans.
“UN rights body approves US-Egypt free speech text.”
The Associated Press, October 2, 2009.

Killing of Non-Muslims is Legitimate (British Mullah), 2006.
YouTube.com

Laolu Akande.
“U.S. To Partner OIC, As Obama Welcomes Ramadan Fasting Period.”
OnlineNigeria.com, August 23, 2009.

Robert Spencer.
“U.S. co-sponsors anti-free speech resolution at the UN.”
Jihad Watch, October 3, 2009, sec. Free speech.

Wake up, America, 2009.
YouTube.com

What happened to the defenders?

by Travis Michael, a No Compromise Media Contributor

Remember the “Muhammad Cartoon Riots” ?

Muslims worldwide violently protest free speech in an Islamic uprising

Muhammad Cartoon Riots

Muslims worldwide violently protest free speech in an Islamic uprising

And the murder and mayhem that followed Newsweek’s fabricated report about alleged Koran abuse by American GI’s?

“Man arrested for “hate crime” for tossing Koran into toilet”

Newsweek Apologizes

Inaccurate Report on Koran Led to Riots

By Howard Kurtz

Washington Post Staff Writer

Monday, May 16, 2005; Page A01

Newsweek apologized yesterday for an inaccurate report on the treatment of detainees that triggered several days of rioting in Afghanistan and other countries in which at least 15 people died.

How about this;

U.S. General Apologizes for Desecration of Koran

By ANDREW E. KRAMER

Published: May 19, 2008

BAGHDAD — The commander of United States troops in Baghdad asked local leaders and tribal sheiks this weekend for their forgiveness after the discovery that a soldier had used a Koran for target practice at a shooting range…

Or this;

DOJ issues statement “to protect American Muslims;”

Utilizing a secure VPN (Virtual Private Network) Dr. Paul L. Williams has been speaking to his Iranian contacts in their besieged Tehran hideouts every few hours during this crisis. Intrigued by photographs showing a burned Koran at the Tehran University, Dr. Williams inquired about the cause of the “desecration”. Paul was told that hundreds of Korans were destroyed by the “religious” police and militias loyal to President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

What if a Westerner had done this? 

NC points out: Some people are simply more equal than others!

UCC FAILS TO CENSURE JEREMIAH WRIGHT”S RACIST REMARKS

them-jews

by Paul Williams

In a letter to John Thomas, president of the United Church of Christ (UCC), Rev. David Runnion-Bareford, founder of Biblical Witness Fellowship (BWF), called for the mainline Protestant denomination, which includes President Barack Obama as one of its members, to publicly repudiate the anti-Semitic statements which were made this week by Rev. Jeremiah Wright.

Mr. Runnion-Bareford’s organization represents a reactionary conservative wing of the UCC, a mainline Protestant denomination with 1.2 million members.

Rev. Wright, who served for many years as Mr. Obama’s pastor at the Trinity UCC in Chicago, said in an interview this week that President Obama had not spoken with him recently because “them Jews aren’t going to let him talk to me.” He added: “Ethnic cleansing is going on in Gaza. Ethnic cleansing of the Zionists is a sin and a crime against humanity.”

NC asks: Where's the outcry from the left when this guy shoots off his racist mouth? crickets chirping

Wright also said Mr. Obama should have sent a U.S. delegation to the World Conference on Racism held recently in Geneva, Switzerland, but that the president did not for fear of offending Jews and Israel. He specifically cited the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, an influential pro-Israel lobbying group.

 

 

“They [the Jews] will not let him to talk to somebody who calls a spade what it is,” Rev. Wright added. “He’s a politician; I’m a pastor. He’s got to do what politicians do.”

Rev. Runnion-Bareford, in his letter, maintained that such language only promotes violence and hatred against a people close to the heart of God, adding, “The impact of anti-Semitism is graphically illustrated by the tragic murders which took place in the Holocaust Museum in Washington D.C.”

But no criticism of Rev. Wright’s latest remarks has been forthcoming from Mr. Thomas or other leaders of the denomination.

The UCC in several official statements has denounced the Israeli occupation of Gaza and the West Bank and has called for the creation of a Palestinian state.

Rev. Wright is no stranger to controversy. In a sermon delivered in 2003, he said:

“The government gives them [African Americans] the drugs, builds bigger prisons, passes a three-strike law and then wants us to sing ‘God Bless America.’ No, no, no, God damn America, that’s in the Bible for killing innocent people. God damn America for treating our citizens as less than human. God damn America for as long as she acts like she is God and she is supreme.”

In addition to damning America, he told his congregation on the Sunday after Sept. 11, 2001 that the United States had brought on al Qaeda’s attacks because of its own terrorism.

“We bombed Hiroshima, we bombed Nagasaki, and we nuked far more than the thousands in New York and the Pentagon, and we never batted an eye.”

He went on to say:

“We have supported state terrorism against the Palestinians and black South Africans, and now we are indignant because the stuff we have done overseas is now brought right back to our own front yards. America’s chickens are coming home to roost.”

But the UCC has refused to take the minister to task for any of his inflammatory statements. In his defense of the fiery African American minister, UCC President Thomas said in 2008:

“I have first-hand experience of Trinity, its leaders and its ministers, and I know it to be a faithful, generous, and justice-minded congregation that takes seriously its ministry within and among the African-American community on Chicago’s south side.”

ThoughtRogue:  As a native of Fort Worth myself, what the hell is happening to our nation!?  There certainly IS a sickness running rampant..   but, in TEXAS, no less?!  Call in the Rangers to administer some ‘justice’ to these seditious whiners.

Mansfield Flag Controversy Draws Worldwide Outrage

By Carol Cavazos, Dallas / Ft. Worth CBS 11 News

The Republic of Texas

Is it okay to show your patriotism at the office?

For one Arlington woman, the answer was “no” after she hung an American flag in her office just before the Memorial Day weekend.

Debbie McLucas is one of four hospital supervisors at Kindred Hospital in Mansfield. Last week, she hung a three-by-five foot American flag in the office she shares with the other supervisors.

When McLucas came to work Friday, her boss told her another supervisor had found her flag offensive. “I was just totally speechless. I was like, ‘You’re kidding me,’” McLucas said.

McLucas’ husband and sons are former military men. Her daughter is currently serving in Iraq as a combat medic.

Stifling a cry, McLucas said, “I just wonder if all those young men and women over there are really doing this for nothing.”

McLucas said the supervisor who complained has been in the United States for 14 years and is formerly from Africa. McLucas said that supervisor took down the flag herself.

“The flag and the pole had been placed on the floor,” McLucas said. But McLucas also said hospital higher-ups had told her some patients’ families and visitors had also complained.

“I was told it wouldn’t matter if it was only one person,” she said. “It would have to come down.”

McLucas said hospital bosses told her as far as patriotism was concerned, the flag flying outside the hospital building would have to suffice.

Amexica the Bountiful!

“I find it very frightening because if I can’t display my flag,” McLucas asked, “whatother freedoms will I lose before all is said and done?”

Kindred Healthcare’s corporate headquarters are located in Kentucky. We called them for comment when we were first working on this story Tuesday, but they did not return our calls.

Wednesday morning, however, our story received nationwide attention. We have received hundreds of emails and comments from people who had something to say about it.

Among the supporters was a combat medic in Iraq: Debbie McLucas’ daughter, Lillian McLucas Dressig. “My mom is a true hero in my book,” she said.

It was midnight in Iraq when she spoke to CBS 11. Talking about the stand her mother took which could have cost her job, Lillian said, “If it’s the right thing to do, it’s the right thing to do. And, I think we need more people to stand up for what’s right in America.”

Read the rest of this entry »

“If Liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.”   ~George Orwell

ThoughtRogue:  This development, the passage of The Local Law Enforcement Hate Crimes Prevention Act in Congress, is so disturbing on so many levels it provides further proof that our U.S. Constitution is flat-lining as we speak.  Remember when the vaunted, blindfolded Lady Justice carried a sword in one hand, and a scale in the other?  Well, now she is to wield a group-identity cattle-prod in one hand, her num-chucks of empathy in the other, and will flail her opponents with eyes-wide shut as she takes careful notice of the litigant’s skin pigmentation, apparent genitalia, unverifiable claims of sexual “orientation”, flash judgements as to their apparent means, etc., and now most importantly, speculation as to guesses of what MAY have been going on in the perpetrator’s mind (thoughts) at sometime contemporaneous with an alleged crime which MAY have impacted their motivation for such crime!

Can we not agree that all serious crime, especially violent crime, involves some “hate” – whether it be self-hate, hate against society, hate against those of different means, or hate against someone because of some perceived wrong?  But, the legal standard should be based solely on alleged ACTIONS, because they are verifiable (remember proof, facts?)  I shudder to think what new capabilities this Hate Crimes “Prevention” legislation affords the police.  What – they’re so good at mind-reading now, that they can “prevent” crimes by reading your mind before you commit the crime?

This supposed ability of the judicial/law enforcement system to somehow read minds with accuracy AND certainty, in order to criminalize these thoughts (motivations, intentions, haaaate), and to therefore assign it its own punishments, are ipso facto, criminalizing the alleged thoughts themselves!  Are we still living in America?  This obsession with “hate” (feelings, gov.-approved ideology, etc.) and “group rights” and group feelings and grievances is abjectly anti-American.  If we let Big Daddy criminalize our thoughts, you cannot possibly ever live free – exactly as illustrated in the novel 1984.  This new anti-Americanism is an abomination.  Equal application of an abomination is further spreading of the abomination.  The way to vanquish this societal cancer is not to apply it “equally”, but to EXCISE IT from our law and society.  Will the Obomatron administration sign this abomination into law?  Stay tuned…

‘Thought Crimes’ Bill Advances

By Nat Hentoff, senior fellow of the Cato Institute

Big 'Mack' Daddy is Watching over You!

Why is the press remaining mostly silent about the so-called “hate crimes law” that passed in the House on April 29? The Local Law Enforcement Hate Crimes Prevention Act passed in a 249-175 vote (17 Republicans joined with 231 Democrats). These Democrats should have been tested on their knowledge of the First Amendment, equal protection of the laws (14th Amendment), and the prohibition of double jeopardy (no American can be prosecuted twice for the same crime or offense). If they had been, they would have known that this proposal, now headed for a Senate vote, violates all these constitutional provisions.

This bill would make it a federal crime to willfully cause bodily injury (or try to) because of the victim’s actual or perceived “race, color, religion, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity or disability” – as explained on the White House Web site, signaling the president’s approval. A defendant convicted on these grounds would be charged with a “hate crime” in addition to the original crime, and would get extra prison time.

The extra punishment applies only to these “protected classes.” As Denver criminal defense lawyer Robert J Corry Jr. asked (Denver Post April 28): “Isn’t every criminal act that harms another person a ‘hate crime’?” Then, regarding a Colorado “hate crime” law, one of 45 such state laws, Corry wrote: “When a Colorado gang engaged in an initiation ritual of specifically seeking out a “white woman” to rape, the Boulder prosecutor declined to pursue ‘hate crime’ charges.” She was not enough of one of its protected classes.

Corey adds that the state “hate crime” law – like the newly expanded House of Representatives federal bill – “does not apply equally” (as the 14th Amendment requires), essentially instead “criminalizing only politically incorrect thoughts directed against politically incorrect victim categories.”

Whether you’re a Republican or Democrat, think hard about what Corry adds: “A government powerful enough to pick and choose which thoughts to prosecute is a government too powerful.”

But James Madison, who initially introduced the First Amendment to the Constitution, had previously written to Thomas Jefferson on the passage of the Virginia Statute on Religious Freedom: “We have in this country extinguished forever … making laws for the human mind.” No American, he emphasized later, would be punished for his “thoughts.”

However, doesn’t the House “Hate Crimes Bill” state that nothing in the legislation shall “prohibit any expressive conduct protected from legal prohibition” – or speech “protected by the free speech or free exercise clauses in the First Amendment”?

Remember, however, as Kathleen Gilbert notes (LifeSiteNews.com) that “free speech advocates have pointed out that under current U.S. law, any action that ‘abets, counsels, commands (or) induces a perceived ‘hate crime’ shares in the guilt of that crime and is therefore punishable.”

But doesn’t this new bill slip in an insistence that “evidence or expression or association of the defendant may not be introduced as evidence at trial unless the evidence specifically relates to that offense”?

Read the rest of this entry »

by -Mark Steyn

Mark Steyn won his own battle last year against Orwellian “Hate” Police, in his case, masquerading as the Canadian Human Rights Commission after “human rights” complaints were filed by the Canadian Islamic Congress regarding Steyn’s alleged “hateful” writing about the facts of Islam.  Thankfully, enough word got out worldwide about these PC clowns trying to destroy the accused via “hate speech violations” without due process, that these Kangaroo Courts eventually backed down.  [Research is still underway to determine which of the aforementioned PC Police monikers are perfect oxymorons - or merely perfect morons..]

Mark Steyn is also author of the brilliant, yet profoundly chilling, book America Alone which makes clear the stunning realization that civilizational demographics alone will soon transform the human face of our planet.  He deftly proves and warns that “Eurabia” – a continent dominated by Islam – is inevitable and imminent.

Conservative Canadian!

Last year, The New York Times ran a story (front page, above the fold, gosh) on my troubles with the Canadian “thought police”, at the end of which I’m quoted as follows:

Western governments are becoming increasingly comfortable with the regulation of opinion. The First Amendment really does distinguish the U.S., not just from Canada but from the rest of the Western world.

The latest jurisdiction to get way too “comfortable with the regulation of opinion” is the Netherlands. As Andrew noted below, the Amsterdam Court of Appeal has ordered prosecutors to put the politician and film-maker Geert Wilders on trial for “making anti-Islamic statements”.

The Dutch, like the Canadians, think they can maintain social peace by shriveling the bounds of public discourse and bringing what little remains under state regulation. But one notices that the coercive urge, which comes so naturally to Euro-progressives, only goes in one direction. The Swedish Chancellor of Justice shuts down the investigation into the Grand Mosque of Stockholm for selling tapes urging believers to kill “the brothers of pigs and apes” (ie, Jews) because that’s simply “the everyday climate in the rhetoric”. The masked men marching through the streets of London with placards threatening to rain down another 9/11 on the infidels are protected by a phalanx of Metropolitan Police officers. The PC nellies of the Canadian “Human Rights” Commission, happy to hound the last neo-Nazi in Saskatchewan posting to the Internet from his mum’s basement, won’t go anywhere near Abou Hammaad Sulaiman Dameus al-Hayitia, the big-time Montreal imam whose book says infidels are “evil people”, Jews “spread corruption and chaos”, and homosexuals should be “exterminated”.

Instead, the state’s response to explicit Islamic intimidation is to punish those foolish enough to point out that intimidation. You don’t have to be as intemperate as Minheer Wilders can sometimes be: In the Netherlands even the most innocuous statement can get you into trouble. To express his disgust at Theo van Gogh’s murder, the artist Chris Ripke put up a mural outside his studio showing an angel and the words “Thou shalt not kill”. But the cops thought this was somehow a dig at the local mosque and so came round, destroyed the mural, arrested the TV news crew filming it, and wiped their tape. The Dutch have determined to commit societal euthanasia, and dislike fellows pointing out it might not be as painless as they’ve assumed.

-via the BBC News

A Dutch court has ordered prosecutors to put a right-wing politician on trial for making anti-Islamic statements.

Alleged "Hate Criminal" Geert Wilders

Freedom Party leader Geert Wilders made a controversial film last year equating Islam with violence and has likened the Koran to Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf.

“In a democratic system, hate speech is considered so serious that it is in the general interest to… draw a clear line,” the court in Amsterdam said.

Mr. Wilders said the judgement was an “attack on the freedom of expression”.

“Participation in the public debate has become a dangerous activity. If you give your opinion, you risk being prosecuted,” he said.

Not only he, but all Dutch citizens opposed to the “Islamisation” of their country would be on trial, Mr Wilders warned.

“Who will stand up for our culture if I am silenced?” he added.

‘Incitement’

The three judges said that they had weighed Mr Wilders’s “one-sided generalisations” against his right to free speech, and ruled that he had gone beyond the normal leeway granted to politicians.

This is a happy day for all followers of Islam who do not want to be tossed on the garbage dump of Nazism

Gerard Spong, lawyer

“The Amsterdam appeals court has ordered the prosecution of member of parliament Geert Wilders for inciting hatred and discrimination, based on comments by him in various media on Muslims and their beliefs,” the court said in a statement.

“The court also considers appropriate criminal prosecution for insulting Muslim worshippers because of comparisons between Islam and Nazism made by Wilders,” it added.

Anti-Jihad Jihadist

The court’s ruling reverses a decision last year by the public prosecutor’s office, which said Mr Wilders’s comments had been made outside parliament as a contribution to the debate on Islam in Dutch society and that no criminal offence had been committed.

Prosecutors said on Wednesday that they could not appeal against the judgement and would open an investigation immediately.

Gerard Spong, a prominent lawyer who pushed for Mr Wilders’s prosecution, welcomed the court’s decision.

“This is a happy day for all followers of Islam who do not want to be tossed on the garbage dump of Nazism,” he told reporters.

Read the rest of this entry »

NC Reminds: Knowing full well how it impacts one to have someone shut you down, and threatening your life and freedom, this article is very important to read.  Freedom of Speech is a GOD given right.  Not a gov’t right given to you!  It doesn’t matter which country you reside in you have the RIGHT to freely speak your mind,  and voice your concern or opposition or support of any thing you want.  

And furthermore, for you Americans, any Legislator who wants to pass a criminal and anti-Constitutional law such as hate crimes,  or so called “Fairness” doctrines,  get ready for the fight of your life!  It is time for “We the People”, to stop talking about how we need to unite.  It’s time to get rid of ANYONE who wants to throw our freedoms in the toilet!  What part of CONGRESS SHALL MAKE NO LAW do you Legislators not get?  What part of HAND ON BIBLE, SWEAR AN OATH OF ALLEGIANCE  to the Constitution do you LAWMAKERS not get?  I think it’s time these Lawmakers are reminded of their oath!

Americans:  Come on!  

The time for talk is over and action REQUIRED! The action is removal, physical if need be, of anyone violating their OATH of OFFICE.  It’s time to enforce the laws against these kinds of crimes!  We the People have allowed our LAWS to be ridiculed and mocked and we have to fight to get our Country back to being a country of Law. If we don’t have our Law then what’s left? We may as well join the UN.  

*** 

A note from Radarsite:   Today, December 9, 2008, I have just received my third phone call from Lionheart since the onset of my illness. As is typical of this kind and great-hearted man, he is more interested in my health and welfare than his own. He called me once again from his secret hiding place outside of Britain. Why is he in hiding? And who is he hiding from? Simply put, he is in hiding for having the courage to speak the truth. And he is hiding from bloodthirsty Muslim assassins and the oppressive multicultural Thought Police of the British Government. He has promised to send me an update of his situation within the next couple of days. Till then, however, I can tell you that he is due to return to Britain to face charges on January 12, 2009. If convicted, he faces imprisonment in a British Prison — which, given the preponderance of Muslim prisoners, amounts to a death sentence.

For those of you who are unfamiliar with Lionheart’s incredible story, or may have forgotten, I am reposting one of Radarsite’s first articles about the plight of this heroic crusader.
I wish RCP was up and running now so that this could get maximum coverage, but what can you do? I will cross post it to my contributor’s sites and hope that you will all help to spread the word. He needs our help, both moral and financial. Please do what you can. I have. Thanks - rg

Read the rest of this entry »