Silence Citizens!

No Compromise Media

Freedom of the Press?

Only if you have nothing negative to say about Obama

Well, well, well, isn’t this special.

by Jim Turner

It now seems that our military is in the business of silencing the freedom of speech of anyone who even dares to speak out against their commander in chief, Mr. Obama.

RALEIGH, N.C. – The U.S. Army plans to prevent media from covering Sarah Palin’s appearance at Fort Bragg, fearing the event will turn into political grandstanding against President Barack Obama, officials said Thursday.

… McCollum said the Army did not want the Monday event to become a platform to express political opinions “directed against the commander in chief.”

What I find interesting [sickening] is that our military leaders, the defenders of the free republic, will not allow a patriot, Sarah Palin, to speak out in support of our troops, while their commander in chief is doing everything in his power to not support the troops he is suppose to be commanding.

How is that for an oxymoron?

Even more shocking is that according to Tom McCollum, military officials do not consider Sarah – the patriot – a politician because she is critical of Obama and his policies in regards to our troops who are in dire need of support in Afghanistan.

McCollum said it’s not clear if military officials consider Palin a politician but noted that she has been critical of Obama while promoting the book. She said in an interview with ABC News that Obama should provide more troops to Afghanistan.

“It frustrates me and frightens me — and many Americans — that President Obama is dithering around with the decision in Afghanistan,” she said.

Who exactly are the military protecting; Obama’s elites and their egos, or the brave men and women over in Afghanistan?

Next Issue with Free Speech

Here lies the issue. If our military, congress and the Obama Administration are truly claiming to support the constitution of this nation which includes the freedom of speech for every single citizen, then why would Obama and his defenders of socialism be dead set on silencing those exact freedoms?

Why would a defender like Mark Llyod ( FCC Diversity Czar ) believe in the silencing of the press?

“It should be clear by now that my focus here is not freedom of speech or the press. This freedom is all too often an exaggeration. At the very least, blind references to freedom of speech or the press serve as a distraction from the critical examination of other communications policies.

“[T]he purpose of free speech is warped to protect global corporations and block rules that would promote democratic governance.”

Why would a member of Obama’s team be infatuated with dictators like Hugo Chavez?

“In Venezuela, with Chavez, is really an incredible revolution – a democratic revolution. To begin to put in place things that are going to have an impact on the people of Venezuela.

Let me remind you, this is the same Venezuela where Journalists fear for their lives, where they are shot and murdered for their freedom of speech.

A series of violent attacks, including the killing of a newspaper executive, fueled concern among journalists. On June 3, Pierre Fould Gerges, vice president of the Caracas daily Reporte Diario de la Economía, was shot to death by unidentified gunmen.

Why would yet another defender of freedom such as Mr. McChesney wish to remove brick by brick the capitalist system itself, rebuilding the entire society on socialist principles?

Why would Obama put himself in alignment with these men like McChesney who believes that Marxism is the only way for a society?

Why?

Could it be that maybe this new administration and the one prior ( Patriot Act ) actually do not want you to have your freedoms any longer as they finally believe that now is the time for a real revolution to take place by revoking your first amendment rights that were once protected under the constitution that seems to be fading into obscurity?

Was this part of the CHANGE that Obama has been speaking of by transforming America?

Is this the CHANGE that he wishes to enforce upon each and every one of us who live in America?

Doesn’t this kind of remind you of June 4, 1989 all over again?

Well folks,

First they silence the politicians,
then the silence the media,
then they silenced you…

Yup CHANGE we can all believe in…

Sources

NO COMPROMISE MEDIA

Contributor

And Stinking Christians, We control what you say, Got it!

by Jim Turner

In yet another attempt by the Obama Administration, with the silent help of congress (cowards) , our freedom of speech has never been more at risk at being lost than it is right now.

Why? Because while Americans were sipping back on a cold tall one, watching baseball and eating popcorn, the enemies were hard at work within our nation; diligently striving to remove the very freedoms we Americas have neglected for far too long.

For the first time since the signing of our Declaration of Independence we are now heading directly back into the stone age, to square one; with persecution and tyranny if we dare speak out against the powers that be.

The powers like the OIC, who Obama has stated that he wants to partner with.

The same Organization of the Islamic Conference who:

1. Wants to silence any negative remarks against Islam
2. Wants to enforce strict Sharia Law under the Cairo Declaration.
3. Is the collective voice of the Muslims world.

The U.N. Human Rights Council approved the resolution, cosponsored by the U.S. and Egypt, yesterday.

It calls on states to condemn and criminalize “any advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence.” It also condemns “negative stereotyping of religions and racial groups,” which is of course an oblique reference to accurate reporting about the jihad doctrine and Islamic supremacism — which is always the focus of whining by the Organization of the Islamic Conference and other groups about negative “stereotyping” of Islam. They never say anything when people like Osama bin Laden and Khaled Sheikh Mohammed issue detailed Koranic expositions justifying violence and hatred; but when people like Geert Wilders and others report about such expositions, that’s “negative stereotyping.”

And the worst aspect of this and all such measures is that the “Incitement” and the “hatred” are in the eye of the beholder. The powerful can decide to silence the powerless by classifying their views as hate speech. The Founding Fathers tried to protect Americans from tyranny by protecting free speech. Now our free speech is threatened, and tyranny will take advantage of that. — Jihad watch

Why on earth would Obama ever do something so anti-American? Well, that is an easy one, because, by the actions he takes, he clearly shows that he hates America and needs it to CHANGE, CHANGE to the ways of Islam-Marxism, all in the name of reaching out to your friendly neighborhood radical that want your mouth sewn shut.

American diplomats say the measure — co-sponsored by Egypt — is part of the Obama administration’s effort to reach out to Muslim countries.

“Egypt’s cosponsorship of the resolution on freedom of expression is not the result of a real commitment to upholding freedom of expression,” said Jeremie Smith, Geneva director of the Cairo Institute for Human Rights Studies.

“If this were the case, freedom of expression would not be systematically violated on a daily basis in Egypt,” he said.

Others warned that the resolution appears to protect religions rather than believers and encourages journalists to abide by ill-defined codes of conduct.

“Unfortunately, the text talks about negative racial and religious stereotyping, something which most free expression and human rights organizations will oppose,” said Agnes Callamard, executive director of London-based group Article 19.

FRANK JORDANS (AP) – Oct 2, 2009

Sewn shut for anyone who speaks out against tyranny and evil. How that for appeasement, or should I say CHANGE?

Seems like these days we just keep adding so-called hate crime laws towards anyone who speaks out against Islam, but as long as you are a Muslim, no worries, preach all the hate your peaceful beautiful heart desires towards those fitly dirty Americans, Christians and Jews until your completely content. I mean after all isn’t this what Islam teaches, hate towards anyone who is not a Muslim?

Of course it does as stated by the British Imam Mr. Anjum Chaudri .

Don’t you love the religion of peace, or do they just love chopping block square?

source of hate speech: Killing of Non-Muslims is Legitimate (British Mullah)

I mean after all, when Allah said to smite them at the neck, he wasn’t kidding.

Introduction to Surah 47. Muhammad or Al-Qitâl

4. So, when you meet (in fight Jihâd in Allâh’s Cause), those who disbelieve smite at their necks till when you have killed and wounded many of them, then bind a bond firmly (on them, i.e. take them as captives). ..Thus [you are ordered by Allâh to continue in carrying out Jihâd against the disbelievers till they embrace Islâm…

Oh vey, there I go again showing the hate they speak and exposing their evil ways, but according to the new wonderful proposed resolution, this would be classified as hate speech even though it puts Islam in its true light, I mean negative light, no I mean true.

I know, I hear everyone telling me, Mr. Turner we have the second amendment, and this will never happen in America! Really? You might have a piece of paper with words on it, but if Obama and the United Nations have their way, that piece of paper might as well be throw into the fireplace and used to warm your house on a cold winters night as it would become worthless in protecting the free speech of Americans in the New World Politics.

6. But why the fuss, some might ask, if we’re protected by the First Amendment? First, if the U.S. backs a resolution that urges the suppression of some speech, presumably we are taking the view that all countries — including the U.S. — should adhere to this resolution. If we are constitutionally barred from adhering to it by our domestic constitution, then we’re implicitly criticizing that constitution, and committing ourselves to do what we can to change it.

So to be consistent with our position here, the Administration would presumably have to take what steps it can to ensure that supposed “hate speech” that incites hostility will indeed be punished. It would presumably be committed to filing amicus briefs supporting changes in First Amendment law to allow such punishment, and in principle perhaps the appointment of Justices who would endorse such changes (or even the proposal of express constitutional amendments that would work such changes).

Eugene Volokh
Professor of Law, UCLA

So the question is, is it too late to do anything?

It really depends on you. Are we as a nation more interested in our jobs, cars and boats rather than the freedoms of others, the freedom of speech? Is the me generation to wrapped up in themselves to care about anyone else except themselves? If they answer is yes to either of those question, then I am going to find a cave somewhere and sit this one out, just kidding, I mean jail cell somewhere, because this American is not going to lie down and watch our freedoms being stripped away. Our freedom of speech is most important freedom we have. Free speech is extremely more important than popcorn, baseball and beer; truly I mean it, if we defend this freedom then we keep them all. If we lose this one, then you know how it plays out, just look to the Middle East where Islam flourishes.

You know, I went to bed one night before the elections and I still haven’t woken up. This dream called CHANGE is a real dozy and all I can ask is this; what you going to do when the Taliban come for you? If your answer just happens to be to sit at home in silence, that isn’t going to fix this one this time….

And to leave you with one more thought let’s hear Mr. Pat Condell let it rip.

America Wake up!

Pat speaks; Americans listen!

Until next time, if there ever is one, this is Jim hiding out, um I mean signing out.

Night everyone…

Sources

Dale Hurd.
“Is ‘Islamophobia’ a Worldwide Free Speech Threat?.”
CBN News, September 24, 2009, sec. World News.

Dr. Muhammad Taqi-ud-Din Al-Hilali, and Dr. Muhammad Muhsin Khan.
The Noble Quran.

Eugene Volokh.
“Is the Obama Administration Supporting Calls to Outlaw Supposed Hate Speech?.”
The Huffington Post, October 1, 2009, sec. World News..

Frank Jordans.
“UN rights body approves US-Egypt free speech text.”
The Associated Press , October 2, 2009..

Killing of Non-Muslims is Legitimate (British Mullah), 2006. http://www.youtube.com/

Robert Spencer.
“U.S. co-sponsors anti-free speech resolution at the UN.”
Jihad Watch, October 3, 2009, sec. Free speech..

Wake up, America, 2009. http://www.youtube.com .

Laolu Akande.
“U.S. To Partner OIC, As Obama Welcomes Ramadan Fasting Period.”
OnlineNigeria.com, August 23, 2009.

Obama is such a Clown!

In our attempt to protect our country, we, Patriots,  have to be very careful which Bills we object to,  and which Bills we support. For example, in the case of HR 985.  This piece of legislation will protect reporters who, in the course of their job as a journalist,  stumble on any information for their story, that is also needed in a criminal case or investigation. It will also protect the media outlet.

Americans need the free flow of Information

This is also called a shield law,  which have been around for several decades now.  In the past, the High Court rappelled with how to balance First Amendment protection for news gathers while protecting them at the same time when they gathered sources and information in a criminal case.  Basically, this bill claims it will protect the information reporters are gathering which is NOT a bad thing.  If a reporter believes they might be prosecuted if they secure certain information, like in the Watergate debacle, they might not go forward with their reporting if their liberty is at stake. This fear puts a chill on practicing the First Amendment and THAT is not acceptable in a supposed free country! 

The problem Americans have today is that American media no longer subscribes to the once held ethic, “People have a RIGHT to know.”  99% of the reporters are biased, liberal and Marxist and will PROTECT their sources and information if it means their “political man”  will be held accountable for a crime he committed!   Most reporters lost all neutrality in this last election and Congress has proven time and time again, that they can not be trusted!  And from the Citizen perspective, this is a legitimate fear.

Currently there is enough protection for reporters, their sources,  and their information, since information comes from sources,  and America simply does not need another shield law. We have enough laws on our books!   I will object to this law on that ground!  

Verdict is . . .

By the way, bloggers are not mentioned in this bill which is alarming since many bloggers are news gatherers these days.  << if anyone needs protecting these days it’s bloggers!  

Call your Senate Slugs demanding they vote NO on HR 985! 

HR 985, the “Free Flow of Information Act of 2009”   which was introduced in House, will 

In any matter arising under Federal law, a Federal entity may not compel a covered person to provide testimony or produce any document related to information obtained or created by such covered person as part of engaging in journalism, unless a court determines by a preponderance of the evidence, after providing notice and an opportunity to be heard to such covered person

What is a covered person?

The term `covered person’ means a person who regularly gathers, prepares, collects, photographs, records, writes, edits, reports, or publishes news or information that concerns local, national, or international events or other matters of public interest for dissemination to the public for a substantial portion of the person’s livelihood or for substantial financial gain and includes a supervisor, employer, parent, subsidiary, or affiliate of such covered person.

 

I wanted to give a shout out to all of those far and wide who are supporting me because of this anti-American action taken against me!  If we are going to protect our free speech in this still great Nation we have to stand up for our Freedoms regardless of who we are politically!

So far the following Courageous Fighting Warriors through their blogs, magazines, websites and networks are supporting me and following this story:

Doctor Bulldog

Always on Watch

Infidel Bloggers Alliance

US Weekly Note the Circled Red Alert!

Many hosts and listeners from BTR which will remain unnamed for their protection UNLESS they choose to comment on this piece!!    

Midnight Sun

Rosetta’s Sister’s

No Runny Eggs

Pheisty Blog

The Merry Widow

Nemosini

D=S

WGN the Voice of Chicago Will be doing a piece on this situtation

Right Jab

Road Sassy

Laura’s Place:  Laura’s says, “I recently had a peck of trouble [on BTR] for posting a an anti-Obama thread.”

Marathon Pundit 

Fight Fire with Fire

Act for America–Oregon Chapter

Act for America–Golden Gate Chapter

Act for America–Tacoma Chapter

Act for America–Austin Chapter

Act for America–Northern Virginia Chapter

Act for America– NY chapter

Security Sisters

Many supporters from AARP