ThePeoplesCube.com–these dudes are hell-air-ee-US!
UPDATE: Please take a few minutes to make your thoughts known on this issue at this article about BTR, of course AFTER you express yourself here. Thank you.
Please send your letters to the addresses below, and I would appreciate all of those who believe I was abused to post this letter on your blogs with requests from your readers to write to BTR as well.

To:
Phillip Recchia–philiprecchia@blogtalkradio.com
Alan Levy–alanlevy@blogtalkradio.com/ BOUNCED
Amy Domestic–amydomestic@blogtalkradio.com
<< Shannon Dingee-Kramer–shannondingee@blogtalkradio.com
Yesterday I had attorney Phil Berg as a guest on my show. He has several decades of experience in the legal field, and has filed a lawsuit against Candidate Barack Obama.
I was about 13 minutes into my show and BTR decided to remove my show right in the middle of my interview claiming that my show was
“racially or ethnically offensive, defamatory, unreasonably violent, threatening, intimidating or harassing; 2. contains falsehoods or misrepresentations that could damage BlogTalkRadio or any other person;” stated BTR assistant Director of Customer Relations, Shannon Dingee-Kramer.
Of course, Ms. Dingee-Kramer provided no proof of this apparent violation of this vague and arbitrary offense. It’s just pure opinion which seems to be more important than my opinion or Mr. Berg’s opinion.
Her decision to remove my show was ARBITRARY and unacceptable! There was nothing abusive about my show on ANY level however, the action taken against me was very abusive!
In fact, I find BTR’s and specifically, Ms. Dingee-Kramer’s opinion and action politically offensive, defamatory, unreasonably violent, threatening, intimidating and harassing; 2. which contains falsehoods and misrepresentations that HAS damaged ME as a person!
Those who are voting for Obama didn’t like my guest, nor my content, and they demanded my show be removed. Is this acceptable behavior? NO! Is this how BTR handles free speech issues? YES! They shut people down because they disagree with the speech?
This is disgusting and Orwellian at best! The BTR leadership ought to be ashamed of themselves for their unAmerican actions! Americans should NOT care about offending people MORE than protecting one’s Right to speak! Where do you people live? North Korea?
Good gawd, what is happening to this country when people are whining and using power to shut others up? Why would you dare want to be a part of that?
Your treatment of me and what I believe in is disgusting and smacks of a violation of my Civil Rights. I am sure that BTR is licensed in several ways and thus can not just arbitrarily violate my federal Civil Rights.
I will be looking into this clear violation.
The recovery I seek is I want my show and all that I worked for over the last several months to be restored immediately like it was when BTR violated my rights without warrant! I would also like an apology as well!
Thank you for your immediate attention to this urgent Civil Rights matter!
Tracy at No Compromise
nocompromisewhenyoureright at gmail dot com
###
The following are some of the letters that have been sent to BTR. Many more have been sent to BTR without CCing me.
Dear Talk Radio Representatives,
Just because you disagree with someone’s political viewpoints is no reason to silence them and stifle their free speech. A lot of people, myself included, count on people like Tracy to organize speakers and engage them in debate and discussion of current events and politics. I think the question of Obama’s citizenship and his eligibility for the presidency are fair game for talk radio. Was it Jeremiah Wright who said “Yo ho ho, Western Civ’s Gotta Go!”? Well, you and your collegues are helping it go. There is no compromise when you are right, and you folks are definitely wrong. Must we all form in line and chant the same slogans and echo the same elitist viewpoints. Is it not okay to disagree and say so??
Since when is it racist to question or criticize a black man or tell him no? Have we become so patronizing as a society that we have to destroy free speech in order to shield the black man from any scrutiny or unpleasant criticism.
We are not the owners of these liberties our forefathers worked so hard for; we are merely the custodians of it. I don’t want to be explaining to my grandchildren why we live in a Brave New World. Please do the right thing, and reinstate Tracy’s show. I also think an apology would be in order. Calling someone a racist is slanderous (or libelous) as well as barely concealed bullying tactic to silence them so you can have the last word.
Olga
***
Another note:
It’s always fascinating to witness liberals constant talk of “freedoms” and “choices” as they do everything in their power to LIMIT those freedoms and choices.
I guess if you speak of freedom and choice enough, it can effectively mask your true intentions. Even IN YOUR OWN MIND ! Which explains some peoples support for todays liberal ideals. There are those who are fully aware of what they’re doing though. For them there is no sufficient excuse.
TL
***
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
That is Amendment I of the Constitution of the United States of America and last I checked that is where we live! It’s a shame that free speech these days seems to only belong to the liberal left and if anyone else speaks about something that they don’t like they just pull the plug. What happened to the exchange of ideas? Why does the media feel they have to protect Barack Hussein Obama? Is there something more sinister going on? Why would something of public record being reported be considered racist? If it was about McCain you can bet that it would be all over the airwaves. No one seems too concerned about offending Anglos but will tip toe through broken glass to protect the feelings of someone considered a minority, well boo whoo … lets grow up. What is the premise of blog talk radio? Is censorship the new code or perhaps the mission statement? It would seem that all sides of issues should be examined and not just what’s comfortable for the “Left”! Tracy did nothing wrong, plain and simple!
Let Freedom Ring …
T.J.
Have a Beautiful Day!
***
Congratulations!
You have lost a listener because of your flagrant and unnecessary censorship of Tracy for her interview of Philip Berg.
What did you accomplish by doing this? It is not as if the truth isn’t already out there for all to find out about. This story has been online for awhile, as shown below:
http://www.militarytimes.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1569590
What you have done is set the stage for your own self-destruction. Such categoric sensorship will not be tolerated by freedom-loving Americans without a response. This e-mail is but a taste of what BTR will receive in the weeks and months to come.
Sincerely,
Curtis
***
Dear Sir and Madame –
Last time I checked, the 1st Amendment has not been repealed.
Given that, I am curious under what authority Ms. Dingee-Kramer censored Tracy’s interview of Philip Berg concerning his suit contesting Obama’s eligibility to run for the president.
I have seen and heard many interviews with Mr. Berg, and have not found any to be, in Ms. Dingee-Kramer’s words, “racially or ethnically offensive, defamatory, unreasonably violent, threatening, intimidating or harassing; 2. contains [sic] falsehoods or misrepresentations that could damage BlogTalkRadio or any other person;”.
The only rational conclusion is that Ms. Dingee-Kramer wanted to suppress any information damaging to the “anointed one” (ignore it and it might go away!).
Hmm, suppression of thoughts and ideas – kind of reminds me of a crazy little German guy with a goofy mustache from the 1930s and 1940s…
I guess the free marketplace of ideas at BTR is only open to those on the far Left.
Nick
***
To Whom It May Concern:
I just read online that you cut off a blog radio talk show and closed the account in violation of the host’s constitutional right to freedom of speech. Why? Because she had the nerve to interview a guest about a current legal action against Obama, a current candidate for President. If you’re going to squelch constitutional freedoms for one – are you squelching them for all? Have you also cancelled accounts of any and all talk show hosts that have spoken out against our current President of the United States ? Or how about those speaking out against Obama’s competition – McCain and Palin?
If Obama is not a legal national born citizen he has NO right to be President – that is the constitutional law of our land. There is a pending case requesting proof that Obama is legally eligible. Why shouldn’t Americans be aware of the questions? Shouldn’t Americans also be made aware that Obama is trying to do away with our 1st Amendment right of freedom of speech? Please issue an apology to Tracy and get Tracy back on the air immediately.
If you cave in to Obama’s pressure in violation of your 1st Amendment rights; I hope Tracy has the guts to file a law suit against both Obama and you for violating hers – before the rest of us lose ours. Would the ACLU take her civil rights case – or are they so in the tank for Obama and his far left liberal agenda that they would refuse?
Sincerely,
Granny T
Illinois
***
Readers Say: