NO COMPROMISE MEDIA

Contributor

And Stinking Christians, We control what you say, Got it!

by Jim Turner

In yet another attempt by the Obama Administration, with the silent help of congress (cowards) , our freedom of speech has never been more at risk at being lost than it is right now.

Why? Because while Americans were sipping back on a cold tall one, watching baseball and eating popcorn, the enemies were hard at work within our nation; diligently striving to remove the very freedoms we Americas have neglected for far too long.

For the first time since the signing of our Declaration of Independence we are now heading directly back into the stone age, to square one; with persecution and tyranny if we dare speak out against the powers that be.

The powers like the OIC, who Obama has stated that he wants to partner with.

The same Organization of the Islamic Conference who:

1. Wants to silence any negative remarks against Islam
2. Wants to enforce strict Sharia Law under the Cairo Declaration.
3. Is the collective voice of the Muslims world.

The U.N. Human Rights Council approved the resolution, cosponsored by the U.S. and Egypt, yesterday.

It calls on states to condemn and criminalize “any advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence.” It also condemns “negative stereotyping of religions and racial groups,” which is of course an oblique reference to accurate reporting about the jihad doctrine and Islamic supremacism — which is always the focus of whining by the Organization of the Islamic Conference and other groups about negative “stereotyping” of Islam. They never say anything when people like Osama bin Laden and Khaled Sheikh Mohammed issue detailed Koranic expositions justifying violence and hatred; but when people like Geert Wilders and others report about such expositions, that’s “negative stereotyping.”

And the worst aspect of this and all such measures is that the “Incitement” and the “hatred” are in the eye of the beholder. The powerful can decide to silence the powerless by classifying their views as hate speech. The Founding Fathers tried to protect Americans from tyranny by protecting free speech. Now our free speech is threatened, and tyranny will take advantage of that. — Jihad watch

Why on earth would Obama ever do something so anti-American? Well, that is an easy one, because, by the actions he takes, he clearly shows that he hates America and needs it to CHANGE, CHANGE to the ways of Islam-Marxism, all in the name of reaching out to your friendly neighborhood radical that want your mouth sewn shut.

American diplomats say the measure — co-sponsored by Egypt — is part of the Obama administration’s effort to reach out to Muslim countries.

“Egypt’s cosponsorship of the resolution on freedom of expression is not the result of a real commitment to upholding freedom of expression,” said Jeremie Smith, Geneva director of the Cairo Institute for Human Rights Studies.

“If this were the case, freedom of expression would not be systematically violated on a daily basis in Egypt,” he said.

Others warned that the resolution appears to protect religions rather than believers and encourages journalists to abide by ill-defined codes of conduct.

“Unfortunately, the text talks about negative racial and religious stereotyping, something which most free expression and human rights organizations will oppose,” said Agnes Callamard, executive director of London-based group Article 19.

FRANK JORDANS (AP) – Oct 2, 2009

Sewn shut for anyone who speaks out against tyranny and evil. How that for appeasement, or should I say CHANGE?

Seems like these days we just keep adding so-called hate crime laws towards anyone who speaks out against Islam, but as long as you are a Muslim, no worries, preach all the hate your peaceful beautiful heart desires towards those fitly dirty Americans, Christians and Jews until your completely content. I mean after all isn’t this what Islam teaches, hate towards anyone who is not a Muslim?

Of course it does as stated by the British Imam Mr. Anjum Chaudri .

Don’t you love the religion of peace, or do they just love chopping block square?

source of hate speech: Killing of Non-Muslims is Legitimate (British Mullah)

I mean after all, when Allah said to smite them at the neck, he wasn’t kidding.

Introduction to Surah 47. Muhammad or Al-Qitâl

4. So, when you meet (in fight Jihâd in Allâh’s Cause), those who disbelieve smite at their necks till when you have killed and wounded many of them, then bind a bond firmly (on them, i.e. take them as captives). ..Thus [you are ordered by Allâh to continue in carrying out Jihâd against the disbelievers till they embrace Islâm…

Oh vey, there I go again showing the hate they speak and exposing their evil ways, but according to the new wonderful proposed resolution, this would be classified as hate speech even though it puts Islam in its true light, I mean negative light, no I mean true.

I know, I hear everyone telling me, Mr. Turner we have the second amendment, and this will never happen in America! Really? You might have a piece of paper with words on it, but if Obama and the United Nations have their way, that piece of paper might as well be throw into the fireplace and used to warm your house on a cold winters night as it would become worthless in protecting the free speech of Americans in the New World Politics.

6. But why the fuss, some might ask, if we’re protected by the First Amendment? First, if the U.S. backs a resolution that urges the suppression of some speech, presumably we are taking the view that all countries — including the U.S. — should adhere to this resolution. If we are constitutionally barred from adhering to it by our domestic constitution, then we’re implicitly criticizing that constitution, and committing ourselves to do what we can to change it.

So to be consistent with our position here, the Administration would presumably have to take what steps it can to ensure that supposed “hate speech” that incites hostility will indeed be punished. It would presumably be committed to filing amicus briefs supporting changes in First Amendment law to allow such punishment, and in principle perhaps the appointment of Justices who would endorse such changes (or even the proposal of express constitutional amendments that would work such changes).

Eugene Volokh
Professor of Law, UCLA

So the question is, is it too late to do anything?

It really depends on you. Are we as a nation more interested in our jobs, cars and boats rather than the freedoms of others, the freedom of speech? Is the me generation to wrapped up in themselves to care about anyone else except themselves? If they answer is yes to either of those question, then I am going to find a cave somewhere and sit this one out, just kidding, I mean jail cell somewhere, because this American is not going to lie down and watch our freedoms being stripped away. Our freedom of speech is most important freedom we have. Free speech is extremely more important than popcorn, baseball and beer; truly I mean it, if we defend this freedom then we keep them all. If we lose this one, then you know how it plays out, just look to the Middle East where Islam flourishes.

You know, I went to bed one night before the elections and I still haven’t woken up. This dream called CHANGE is a real dozy and all I can ask is this; what you going to do when the Taliban come for you? If your answer just happens to be to sit at home in silence, that isn’t going to fix this one this time….

And to leave you with one more thought let’s hear Mr. Pat Condell let it rip.

America Wake up!

Pat speaks; Americans listen!

Until next time, if there ever is one, this is Jim hiding out, um I mean signing out.

Night everyone…

Sources

Dale Hurd.
“Is ‘Islamophobia’ a Worldwide Free Speech Threat?.”
CBN News, September 24, 2009, sec. World News.

Dr. Muhammad Taqi-ud-Din Al-Hilali, and Dr. Muhammad Muhsin Khan.
The Noble Quran.

Eugene Volokh.
“Is the Obama Administration Supporting Calls to Outlaw Supposed Hate Speech?.”
The Huffington Post, October 1, 2009, sec. World News..

Frank Jordans.
“UN rights body approves US-Egypt free speech text.”
The Associated Press , October 2, 2009..

Killing of Non-Muslims is Legitimate (British Mullah), 2006. http://www.youtube.com/

Robert Spencer.
“U.S. co-sponsors anti-free speech resolution at the UN.”
Jihad Watch, October 3, 2009, sec. Free speech..

Wake up, America, 2009. http://www.youtube.com .

Laolu Akande.
“U.S. To Partner OIC, As Obama Welcomes Ramadan Fasting Period.”
OnlineNigeria.com, August 23, 2009.

A No Compromise Media Contributor

but the question is, Are You Listening?

by Mr. H

As we go back and re-examine the speech Obama delivered to the Islamic community, around the world, from the White House, about Ramadan we will have to listen closely to see what we can learn.

This time, instead of writing, the team here at The Chronicle Watch decided to put words into video in order to help better express the concerns that were raised during Obama’s speech.

While there are many issues found in Obamas speech, we are going to address only a handful at this time.

1. His Faith.
2. Communities
3. Organization of the Islamic Center

Let’s listen

source Obama speaks, but are you listening?

Faith

As discussed earlier in an article titled, Mr. Obama is a Christian, we need to continue to ask a simple question.

Why would a self professed Christian recite the Shahada, the Muslims call to faith in perfect Arabic, when the recital makes one a Muslim according to Islamic teachings?

Communities

As we listen to the words of Mr. Obama we hear him bring up the word community time and time again, and now, all of a sudden, we see that the State Department, for the first time ever, appointed a Special Representative to Muslim Communities within the United States.

The question is, is this really the first time that Mr. Obama tried to have Islam breach the White House?

The answer is NO.

In 2008 Mr. Obama appointed a man by the name of Mazen Asbahi as his emissary to the Muslim Communities in the United States. The issue is that this man, Mazen Asbahi, has ties to the Islamic Society of North America which was an unindicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land Foundation case; the Holy Land Foundation is allegedly a front group for the terror organization Hamas.

After this was found out about, Mr. Asbahi, the new community leader resigned in order to, “avoid distracting from Barack Obama’s message of change.” ^{[ 1 ]}

Organization of the Islamic Conference ( OIC)

Continuing on with the speech he delivered, we heard Mr. Obama express how, “we are moving forward to partner with the OIC”.

The question is, who is the OIC?

The Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC) is the second largest inter-governmental organization after the United Nations which has membership of 57 states spread over four continents. The Organization is the collective voice of the Muslim world and ensuring to safeguard and protect the interests of the Muslim world in the spirit of promoting international peace and harmony among various people of the world. ^{[ 2 ]}

It seems that from what is expressed on the OIC website, that they are the second largest organization in the world after the United Nations, and that they are the collective voice of the Muslim world.

The next question we have is, what voice are they interested in expressing?

In 2007, OIC Secretary General Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu, widely considered to be a “moderate” Muslim professor from Turkey, used the UN’s “International Day of Tolerance” to assert that freedom of speech was unacceptable if it was used to criticize Islam. ^{[ 3 ]}

Then in 2008 this sentiment was expressed yet again.

“In 2008, the Organization of the Islamic Conference laid out a 10-year plan for suppression of free speech and for the introduction of laws that would prevent criticisms of religions and the reading of Islam…” ^{[ 4 ]}

According to the words expressed on the OIC website they claim to be the collective voice of the Muslim world; a voice according to the Cairo Declaration where rights and freedoms are stipulated under strict Islamic law.

The OIC calls itself the collective voice of the world-wide Muslim “ummah,” or nation. It has its own declaration of human rights, called the Cairo Declaration.

The document states “All rights and freedoms stipulated in this Declaration are subject to the Islamic Shari’ah,” which is strict Islamic law. ^{[ 5 ]}

Another alarming issue is what they, the OIC, consider terrorism. A act so terrorizing that it is a threat to world peace.

Marshall Sana, an Islamic expert at Barnabas Fund, said the OIC “actually wields an enormous amount of influence.”

“That’s been evident the last few years with perhaps its number one agenda item, which is combating ‘Islamophobia‘ as they call it, or the defamation of religion,” he added.

The OIC calls Islamophobia “the worst form of terrorism” and a threat to world peace. ^{[ 6 ]}

Final Thoughts

As we see alignments like never before being made by this administration the question remains, “how can an American President knowing the views and ties within these organization wish to partner with them”?

Why would a president of any nation align themselves with countries that have never been considered friends of the nation in which they rule?

Maybe the answer is that this President is really after a CHANGE; a change that comes under the guise of Islamic law.

Source

1. CHAREN: A friendship of concern, by Mona Charen
   http://www.washingtontimes.com/
2. Organization of the Islamic Conference
   http://www.oic-oci.org/
3. discoverthenetworks.org
   discoverthenetworks.org
4. Is ‘Islamophobia’ a Worldwide Free Speech Threat?, Dale Hurd
   http://www.cbn.com/
5. Ibid
6. Ibid