UPDATE II: Dog sez: (Look at pictures) Okay, you will notice that the name of the Registrar is Joshua Simon ODUYA. First of all, notice that the last name is all caps and the ODUYA has the same number of letters and the same vowel placement as OBAMA. In fact, the signature is somewhat reminiscent of Obama’s own signature… But, that’s not the clincher…
Now, Joshua is a fairly common name, which is the Greek name of Jesus, the Messiah! What do we call Obama? The false Messiah or the One! Now, in and of itself, this not the clincher…
The clincher is in the middle name of Simon!!!
As I was thinking about the middle name of Simon, it suddenly occurred to me that there was an evil Simon briefly mentioned in the Acts of the Apostles…
If you go to ACTS chapter 8, verses 9-11, you will find, in the KJV translation, the following:
“But there was a certain man, called Simon, which beforetime in the same city used sorcery, and bewitched the people of Samaria, giving out that himself was some great ONE:
To whom they all gave heed, from the least to the greatest, saying, This man is the great power of God. And to him they had regard, because that of long time he had bewitched them with sorceries.”
The phrase, “Great One” clinches it!!!
You really have to admire the ingenuity of the person or persons (who I suspect is/are from the Fifty-Seven-Thirty-Three group) who put this thing together!
Brilliant little buggers!
UPDATE I:
Truth is always the goal! Hussein Obama is hell bent on hiding that Truth and if Truth be told, we aren’t really sure why he’s going to such great lengths, we can only speculate. One can’t deny that at this time, Americans still do not know anything about this fraud! Why? Because Obama is hiding his past! Why? Because he has something to hide? What? It must be well worth the one million dollars he has spent thus far to hide it whatever it is! Now . . .
This Birth Certificate is a FORGERY planted by the Marxist trying to make those seeking the TRUTH look like idiots. Marxists have to lie about everything they do because they know what they do and the bull crap they are trying to push on you won’t stand up to logically muster! What’s the matter with the Truth that they will go to great links to hide the Truth?
Thanks to Dr. Bulldog’s keen eye and good smell for crap, he caught all the clues. The registration number has the initials of B and O as well as the numbers of 47 and 44. The Obamunist was 47 when he usurped the POTUS and that office is the 44th office. The number 5733 represents the sodomite, Butt Buddy crowd, yep they are probably the ones responsible for the forgery.
Kenya was also not a Republic until 1963.
It is in the nature of the Marxist to lie. They deny and rape the truth and won’t admit when they are wrong. Well, on ward and up theirs!
****
NC Sez: A couple of weeks back there was a fake BC running around the internet. The BC below has a seal and a letterhead and details. Take a look and let me know what you think. I do wonder in Bill O’Reilly’s supposed investigation into faux-bama’s birth why he didn’t make his investigation known to his audience. Show us the proof, O’Reilly! What did you “discover?” Orly Taitz is conducting a REAL investigation and shows the world her proof!
Once more:
1. Obama admits his father was born in Kenya and was never a naturalized Citizen of this Country. <<< THIS ALONE DISQUALIFIES OBAMA, but let’s move on;
2. The Constitution requires that BOTH of the candidate’s parents must either be born or naturalized in this Country to meet POTUS qualifications. Again, BOTH PARENTS, not one parent.
3. During the campaign, liberal Democrats screeched and demanded that McCain PROVE his Constitutional qualifications which he did, and the Senate unanimously passed a resolution agreeing with that proof. Obama signed on to it.
4. Now liberals refuse to force their demi-god to meet the same qualifications as any other candidate, KNOWING that Obama has admitted in his book “Dreams of my Father” that his father never was born, nor naturalized in this Country! This is solid proof that Liberals have more Rights than others. Obama is a liar, a ANTI-AMERICAN Marxist, and working to destroy America, and true Americas will force Obama out of office, IN SHAME, I might add!
5. This is flat out anti-Americanism and the tea-bagging Obots just don’t want a TRUE American Black Man in office!
Attorney files motion for authentication of alleged 1960s certificate from Africa
by WND
WASHINGTON – California attorney Orly Taitz, who has filed a number of lawsuits demanding proof of Barack Obama’s eligibility to serve as president, has released a copy of what purports to be a Kenyan certification of birth and has filed a new motion in U.S. District Court for its authentication.
This document purports to be a Kenyan certification of birth for Barack Obama, allegedly born in Mombasa, Kenya, in 1961
The document lists Obama’s parents as Barack Obama II and Stanley Ann Obama, formerly Stanley Ann Dunham, the birth date as Aug. 4, 1961, and the hospital of birth as Coast General Hospital in Mombasa, Kenya.
Document enlarged to show detail alleges Barack Obama was born at Coast General Hospital in Mombasa on Aug. 4, 1961
No doctor is listed. But the alleged certificate bears the signature of the deputy registrar of Coast Province, Joshua Simon Couya. It was allegedly issued as a certified copy of the original in February 1964.
WND was able to obtain other birth certificates from Kenya for purposes of comparison, and the form of the documents appear to be identical.
An enlarged view of the bottom of the document
Last week, a counterfeit document purporting to be Obama’s Kenyan birth certificate made the rounds of the Internet, but was quickly determined to be fraudulent. The new document released by Taitz bears none of the obvious traits of a hoax.
Taitz’s most celebrated case involved a military officer, Maj. Stefan Cook, whose order to deploy to Afghanistan was revoked when he challenged Obama’s eligibility to hold office. That case has now been refiled in federal court in Florida, raising the specter of a class-action claim among members of the military that their orders aren’t valid because of questions surrounding Obama’s constitutional eligibility.
The suit seeks damages and a declaratory judgment. Named as defendants are Simtech, Cook’s former civilianemployer, and several officials, including Col. Louis B. Wingate and Secretary of Defense Robert Gates.
WND previously reported a judge in Georgia dismissed Cook’s case when the government suddenly revoked his orders to report to Fort. Benning for deployment to Afghanistan.
WND reported when the case originally was filed that Cook’s concern was that without proof that there is a legitimate commander in chief, the entire U.S. Army becomes “merely a corps of chattel slaves under the illegitimate control of a private citizen.”
Cook told WND: “As an officer in the armed forces of the United States, it is [my] duty to gain clarification on any order we may believe illegal. With that said, if President Obama is found not to be a ‘natural-born citizen,’ he is not eligible to be commander in chief.”
The new complaint says it seeks Cook’s reinstatement with his civilian employer, Simtech Inc., as well as protection from the Department of Defense and president “from further retaliation for plaintiff’s challenge to the president’s constitutional authority.”
WND has reported on dozens of legal challenges to Obama’s status as a “natural born citizen.” The Constitution, Article 2, Section 1, states, “No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President.”
Some of the lawsuits question whether he was actually born in Hawaii, as he insists. If he was born out of the country, Obama’s American mother, the suits contend, was too young at the time of his birth to confer American citizenship to her son under the law at the time.
Other challenges have focused on Obama’s citizenship through his father, a Kenyan subject to the jurisdiction of the United Kingdom at the time of his birth, thus making him a dual citizen. The cases contend the framers of the Constitution excluded dual citizens from qualifying as natural born.
Complicating the situation is Obama’s decision to spend sums estimated in the hundreds of thousands of dollars to avoid releasing a state birth certificate that would put to rest all of the questions.
WND has reported that among the documentation not yet available for Obama includes his kindergarten records, his Punahou school records, his Occidental College records, his Columbia University records, his Columbia thesis, his Harvard Law School records, his Harvard Law Review articles, his scholarly articles from the University of Chicago, his passport, his medical records, his files from his years as an Illinois state senator, his Illinois State Bar Association records, any baptism records, and his adoption records.
Developing …
ragingcapitalist
on Aug 2nd, 2009
@ 9:03 pm:
It is so laughable how many people miss the point entirely on this issue. The issue IS NOT whether or not birthers wear tin foil hats. The issue is that Obama can clear this all up in a day by doing what would be expected of anyone else and that is to release all his documents from the past. But he won’t do it because he knows that his Presidency would be over. Quite frankly I don’t care if it tears this country apart. Most if not all Democrats (and some Republicans for that matter) should be physically removed from office for their involvement in this and other issues involving treasonous behavior. These things cannot go unpunished.
Doctor Bulldog
on Aug 3rd, 2009
@ 12:31 am:
Well, I hate to say it, but I think it’s a forgery…
Look at the birth certificate number: 47,044…
Obama was 47 years old at the time of his inauguration as the 44th president…
The 0 (zero) that separates the 47 and 44 is probably being used as substitute for the first initial of his last name – “O”bama…
Now, take a look at the page number in the Deputy Registrar block. It is 44B…
Again, the 44th President and the first initial of his first name – “B”arack.
I’m still in the process of decoding the number 5733 that seems to appear twice on the certificate – once at the top right (it is hard to read, but it looks to me to be 5733), and again in the Deputy Registrar block.
Cheers
nocompromise
on Aug 3rd, 2009
@ 9:01 am:
Dog, Check the Jewish year. I’m not sure but it could be the jewish year of 5733. I’ll check as well.
MaryChristina
on Aug 3rd, 2009
@ 10:59 am:
I hope Obama goes to jail for this fraud, as well as for being the traitor he is which is why he won’t show his birth certificate in the first place. He needs to be locked up for life in one of those hundreds of brand new prison camps in America–or sent to Guantanamo to be wi da bros
Lynda
on Aug 3rd, 2009
@ 2:33 pm:
Great job Doctor Bulldog decoding the birth certificate as I know everything has a symbolic counterpoint. Although, I just don’t understand ‘who’ and ‘why’ this would be done anymore than I can comprehend why Obama won’t produce an original birth certificate once and for all and put an end to all the speculation. Again, to what end? People of the Lie—all of them!
Patrick Sperry
on Aug 3rd, 2009
@ 3:37 pm:
This certainly does add a new set of factors to the mix.
Linked back here to you Tracy.
Doctor Bulldog
on Aug 3rd, 2009
@ 9:03 pm:
Lynda,
It’s all about distracting and discrediting the birthers.
If the AfterBirthers (those who ridicule, attack, and vehemently go After the Birthers) can distract the Birthers by getting them to bite the hook baited with a false document, they can immediately point fingers at those who fell for the lie and further publicly humiliate, poke fun at, and marginalize the Birther movement.
Meanwhile, it begins to pit various Birthers against one another and introduces doubt into the family of Birthers; splintering the already tenuous coalition.
Point in fact, I had one Birther come to my website and dump a gallon of vitriol on me because he/she thought I was another mindless Lefturd foolishly supporting Obama because I was pointing out that the Kenyan Birth Certificate is a hoax. I tried to explain that I have a responsibility to myself and my readers to search out the truth – even when the truth hurts, as was this case. I still have not heard back from him/her, and I doubt I ever will as he/she—confident in the knowledge that I am an ass—probably never looked back once the vitriol had been dumped all over my floor.
Furthermore, releasing fake documents, along with Obama and his sycophants working overtime to conceal his real documents, is but a red-herring in the Obamites’ tackle box; It keeps everyone in America distracted from the simple truth: Obama CANNOT be a “natural-born” citizen because he was born with dual-citizenship—the very thing our Founding Fathers were trying to prevent with Article II, Section 1.
One need look no farther than the damage Obama has wrought in just 6 months time before one realizes that Our Founding Fathers were much wiser than anyone of us could ever imagine; and now, America is paying the price for ignoring their sage advice!!!
Cheers
Ben
on Aug 3rd, 2009
@ 10:36 pm:
You mean the forgery? This issue is as clear as it’s ever going to get (http://online.wsj.com/public/article/SB10001424052970204619004574320190095246658.html).
We need to focus instead on fighting important battles — for health care freedom, limited government, 2nd Amendment & 10th Amendment rights, etc. The “birther” controversy is a terrible distraction that allows the pro-Obama crowd to marginalize the opposition.
nocompromise
on Aug 3rd, 2009
@ 11:12 pm:
Link was dead, Ben, but I thought Constitutional qualifications was important just like health care freedom, limited government, 2nd Amendment & 10th Amendment rights.
We are Americans, and we as individuals, do what we are called to do! It’s a problem when we don’t do what we are called to do!
Doctor Bulldog
on Aug 4th, 2009
@ 2:16 am:
Remove the parenthesis off the end of Ben’s link…
Now, having read the WSJ article, I couldn’t help but notice how it skipped over the fact that Obama was born with dual citizenship.
This, of course, was the very thing Our Founding Fathers were trying to avoid when they drafted Article II, Section 1…
Funny how most all articles which attempt to feed and calm the sheeple forget to mention that little “dual citizenship” fact. And, if by some fluke, they do happen to mention that tidbit, they do their best to invoke the 14th Amendment in an effort to obfuscate the facts.
Unfortunately, for them, the 14th Amendment only covers “citizens” and NOT “natural born” citizens.
But, that’s a subject for another time.
Let’s see what Charles Pinckney—one of the original signers of the U.S. Constitution—had to say about why the President should be “natural born” and not just a citizen of the United States:
http://oll.libertyfund.org/?option=com_staticxt&staticfile=show.php%3Ftitle=1787&chapter=96841&layout=html&Itemid=27
“…to insure experience and attachment to the country, they have determined that no man who is not a natural born citizen, or citizen at the adoption of the Constitution, of fourteen years residence, and thirty-five years of age, shall be eligible.”
…To insure attachment to the country… Yup, that’s pretty damn clear to me.
Now, just in case I might be misunderstanding this, let’s step back a bit to 1803 and take a look at what the legal commentaries were saying at that time in regards to why the framers had inserted the Natural Born clause in Article II, section 1:
http://press-pubs.uchicago.edu/founders/documents/a2_1_1s18.html
“That provision in the constitution which requires that the president shall be a native-born* citizen (unless he were a citizen of the United States when the constitution was adopted,) is a happy means of security against foreign influence, which, wherever it is capable of being exerted, is to he dreaded more than the plague. The admission of foreigners into our councils, consequently, cannot be too much guarded against; their total exclusion from a station to which foreign nations have been accustomed to, attach ideas of sovereign power, sacredness of character, and hereditary right, is a measure of the most consummate policy and wisdom. … The title of king, prince, emperor, or czar, without the smallest addition to his powers, would have rendered him a member of the fraternity of crowned heads: their common cause has more than once threatened the desolation of Europe. To have added a member to this sacred family in America, would have invited and perpetuated among us all the evils of Pandora’s Box.”
*Now, I will admit that the “native-born” might throw you off, but it is quite obvious that the author made a simple mistake, as the Constitution quite clearly says, “Natural Born.”
That being said, I think the rest of that legal commentary from 1803 speaks for itself and is quite prophetic about that whole Pandora’s box thing…
Found Forged Template used in last BC Forgery | No Compromise when you're Right!
on Aug 4th, 2009
@ 5:28 pm:
[...] To read yesterday’s discussion which gives more detail on this forgery click here [...]