Barack Hussein Obama – Usurper-elect
by -Jefferson Paine
Lady Liberty Crumbling
I’d like to take up our reader Ted’s challenge regarding the roiling controversy over Barack Hussein Obama’s (BHO) insouciant inability to provide sufficient evidence that he is duly eligible to be elected to the office of President of the United State of America (POTUS).
- Challenge, can anyone prove this wrong?:-
1. Constitution Article II requires USA President to be “natural born citizen”.
2. BHO’s website admits his dad was Kenyan/British, not American, citizen when BHO was born.
3. BHO is therefore not a “natural born citizen” (irrespective of Hawaiian birth or whether he may be a 14th Amendment “citizen” of USA) – as confirmed in the Senate’s own McCain qualification resolution agreed to by BHO.
4. Supreme Court has already docketed two upcoming conferences, 1/9/09 and 1/16/09 – between dates Congress counts electoral votes (1/8/09) and Presidential inauguration (1/20/09) – to address Berg Case and fashion relief on BHO’s eligibility to be President.
5. Since no facts are in dispute, Supreme Court rules on Summary Judgment to enjoin BHO’s inauguration as President.
6. Therefore, BHO is not inaugurated as President.
7. Vice President Elect Biden is inaugurated Acting President under the 20th Amendment to serve until new President is determined – the procedure for which determination to be set out by Congress and/or the Supreme Court so long as in conformance with the Constitution.
1) Check. And the question is: What exactly constitutes a “natural born Citizen”? This is where Leftists in general, and Obama sycophants in particular, will begin to twist this thing to Hell and back via claims of ‘vagueness of definition’ and two centuries’ legislation passed regarding “naturalization” of Citizens in the U.S. Make no mistake about it, a “natural born Citizen” is a distinct and separate issue from the naturalizing, or the making of a “naturalized” Citizen.
Critics will claim that this concept is not explicitly defined within the U.S. Constitution (along with most terms) as an excuse to define its “living, breathing” meaning to be anything they please it to mean two centuries hence. It was reported that when the Constitution was drafted, the concept of “natural born” Citizenship was not even explicitly debated and the language was passed unanimously. I posit that this occurred NOT because this concept was “vague” at the time, but to the contrary, such debate was utterly unnecessary because its concept was so UNDERSTOOD. The concept of birthright Citizenship (as opposed to being “naturalized” later by some other process) was known to be naturally endowed within a newborn upon his/her birth to U.S. Citizens upon U.S. soil.
Many candidates for POTUS have had their Citizenship status heavily scrutinized as to the technical legal eligibility to run for the Presidency – from 21st President Chester Arthur to Barry Goldwater to George Romney (Mitt’s father) to John S. McCain III (curiously, most all challenges only of Republicans.. hmm.). The case of John McCain was recently legally settled and I did not witness even crocodile tears from those who now claim it as an illegitimate, unnecessary burden for their candidate BHO to actually prove his own eligibility. Presidential candidate John S. McCain III was born to a U.S. Navy Admiral (himself, son to a U.S. Navy Admiral) and his wife – both U.S. Citizens – at a U.S. military base within the (then) U.S.-controlled Panama Canal Zone.
2) Yes – there is no dispute that BHO’s father was a foreigner from Kenya – which was still administered as a British colony at the date of BHO’s alleged birth. This would make Obama, Sr. a native born Kenyan, and a British colonial subject. BHO’s mother was impregnated by BHO Sr. right about the time she turned eighteen years of age, and the two were allegedly married shortly thereafter prior to BHO Jr.’s birth. The first question is WHERE was BHO born?
I have seen no legitimate proof, yet, that BHO was born on U.S. soil in Hawaii. Even if he had, would his paternal lineage take precedence over his eighteen-year-old mother’s -she who had just recently married this foreigner? (and if she quite possibly conceived BHO as a minor?) Did she ever renounce her U.S. Citizenship during this process (as with her second Muslim husband, who took BHO back to live with him as an Indonesian Citizen)? Does dual citizenship, or perhaps single, foreign citizenship, through his father(s), negate U.S. “native born” status – our Founding Fathers certainly set up this strict requirement in order to eliminate the possibility of foreign loyalties of the POTUS – “dual citizenship” or ANY other loyalty other than solely to the United States of America. I think BHO’s Constitutional argument to be made here (assuming a legitimate one could be made), is whether BHO can be deemed “natural born” to a mother who was presumably a U.S. Citizen, marrying a foreign national, and passes the test without any real proof of birthing her son upon American soil.
BHO’s handlers offer up a “Certification of Live Birth” (digitally, via the Internet) issued by the State of Hawaii, as supposed legal “proof” that he is a natural born Citizen. The fatal problem here is that this IS NOT A BIRTH CERTIFICATE! – and, therefore, proves NOTHING. A genuine, legal “Birth Certificate” states the exact location of birth (the actual hospital and where it is located), the exact time and date, vital statistics of the newborn, identities and status of his parents, the real names of the actual delivering doctor(s) and/or nurses involved in the birth – and the document (and therefore the details contained therein) can be AUTHENTICATED. The only document the Obama Campaign continues to proffer, the “Certification”, satisfies none of these requirements of proof.
Not only can this Hawaiian “birth” be literally phoned in (just as the newspaper announcement was made) and the State subsequently regurgitates a vague, computer print-out of “Certification”, but the actual “certification” that his Campaign has put forth on the Internet has been deemed an obvious forgery by more than one document expert.
Komrade Hopenchange
Contrarily to the foregoing hoax, it is reported that the Obama couple travelled to Kenya around the time of BHO’s alleged birth, and we also now have more than one person there, including his paternal Grandmother (Sr.’s own mother!) who has given a verbal affidavit that she actually WITNESSED BHO’s live birth while his parents were visiting in Kenya. Now, critics claim that she and other relatives are either mistaken, or just liars, but their affidavits, thus far, have shown me more legal “proof” than anything I have yet to see come out of the Obama Campaign. Quickly after his birth in Kenya, his mother reportedly returned to her parents in Hawaii. If this is true, then how easy would it have been, upon her return, to simply phone in the local newspaper announcement and “report” the birth to the State and subsequently receiving her “Certification”, so that she could begin manufacturing his ‘naturalized’ citizenship status on Hawaiian soil?
To assuage critics of his obviously phony, digitalized Certification, BHO now claims that there is some “real” birth certificate ensconced ostensibly in some undisclosed vault, somewhere in the Hawaiian isles, and that the Governor of Hawaii has “seen” it, but that it is so sensitive that no one else – especially professional media reporters, or any U.S. Citizen who will have to suffer his rule – are unauthorized to “see”, let alone examine or authenticate it!
Is it not obvious to everyone that this whole controversy, this imminent Constitutional Crisis, and looming Usurpation of the Office of The POTUS, would be cleared up and would vanish overnight if the purported President-elect, Mr. Barack Hussein Obama would simply reveal his real Birth Certificate to the waiting world?
I posit here that he refuses to perform this simple act because NO REAL BIRTH CERTIFICATE OF HIS EXISTS. If BHO were born anywhere on U.S. soil, a genuine Birth Certificate could be located. Since this solution appears to present an impossibility for him, I am left with no other conclusion than Barack Hussein Obama CANNOT BE and therefore IS NOT a Natural Born Citizen. And therefore, he is INELIGIBLE to OCCUPY the U.S. PRESIDENCY.
3) I believe that arguments stemming from the 14th Amendment, and other peripheral Constitutional issues are really “red herrings” in this case. The 14th Amendment was formulated and passed in the post-Civil War, Reconstruction environment with the express purpose of unambiguously granting (establishing) full, and equal U.S. Constitutional Rights as Citizens to those people, mainly former slaves, whose ancestors were literally abducted from various slave-trading (and often untraceable) soils. This, of course, sadly has been bastardized by our esteemed, black-robed Supremes to also grant the never-intended right of Citizenship to those aliens who unlawfully break into our country and drop an infant upon our American soil (a.k.a. Anchor Babies) – and, more often than not, they illegitimately abuse this ruling for this express purpose! But this, I believe, has no legitimate bearing on the plain language and the original intent of our Founders when it comes to the eligibility of our Commander-in-Chief and his specific and necessary qualifications.
4) No matter what happens in this case, Americans of all stripes will soon witness, by the actions, or likely traitorous inactions, of our Supreme leaders, of no longer how much life our United States Constitution supposedly “breathes”, but rather, whether this heretofore miraculous Founding document, our Supreme Law, our sacred bulwark against Tyranny, IS NOW, in its ENTIRETY A DEAD LETTER.
Why, we venture to speculate, would the current fact that a Presidential Candidate, one BHO, an ostensible Constitutional Lawyer and Professor, shaped by our ‘finest’ universities, to this day refuses to release any of his grades, transcripts, work-product, theses, or applications? I posit it is because they would finally reveal the many citizenship statuses, alias names, Marxist ideologies, foreign loyalties, shady associations, and other frauds he has expertly perpetrated over his entire career to fool people all along the way in his quest to seize the ultimate prize of power.
5) The facts in this appear to absolutely be in dispute. But, if by “no facts are in dispute” you mean that BHO’s sycophants have no legally compelling way to prove their case to a panel of jurists acting fairly and strictly Constitutionally, then I agree that they really have no case and should be enjoined to drop their claim on the Presidency. Sadly, even with no genuine Constitutional case for BHO to continue his charade, and even with no facts in dispute in the eyes of the Court, I have grave doubt whether any of these robed weasels, Roberts and Alito included, have the testicular fortitude (a.k.a. cajones) to do what’s right and stop this Usurper-elect, for fear of widespread “civil unrest” among the electorate!
6) Besides the obvious illegality of that sad ruling to come (if they ever duly review the case’s merits), what I don’t think they’ll seriously take into account, is the civil unrest, and future civil war they’ll actually spark by allowing this Manchurian Candidate to rise to power in such fashion, with gutting of the last vestiges of our tattered U.S. Constitution.
7) The installment of Joseph Biden as POTUS is too much of a stretch for several reasons – chief among them that he, himself, did not run for POTUS. He was APPOINTED as a hypothetical replacement for an illegitimate, illegal, Impostor presidential candidate, BY THAT VERY IMPOSTOR! Therefore, Joseph Biden can make no legitimate claim on the Office of POTUS – regardless of the cacophony of the “Will of the People” (electoral) arguments which are trumped by the principles set forth in the Constitution itself.
I believe that, by January 20th, when GWB can no longer serve in Office of the POTUS, that the U.S. House of Representatives shall have chosen, to be installed on Jan. 20th, a President who serves pro tem, until such time as the House determines a fair way of resolving claims for the proper attainment of the Office – I think John McCain would have such a claim – or perhaps by convening a new, special election solely for determining the next POTUS – from candidates who provably meet all of the eligibility qualifications, of course.
Yours, -Jefferson Paine
MESSAGE TO EVERY MEMBER OF CONGRESS:
When counting the electoral votes, either Congress finds by 1/8/09 that Obama, not being an Article II “natural born citizen”, fails to qualify as President whereupon Biden becomes the full fledged President under 3 USC 19 (free to pick his own VP such as Hillary) or thereafter defers to the Supreme Court to enjoin Obama’s inauguration with Biden becoming only Acting President under the 20th Amendment until a new President is duly determined.
The preferable choice, at least for the Democrats, should seem obvious.
Ted,
Very clever conclusion, but doesn’t your conslusion depend on actually following the U.S. Constitution? Isn’t it safe to say that that’s the one scenario that’s least likely to occur in this case?
I beleive (in hopes that I’m wrong) that “barry” will become the president in SPITE of the legal and constitutional problems. The courts will ignore or even laugh OFF these legal challenges as “ridiculous” or “outrageous.” They’ll repeat the “no standing” argument and all will be well.
Until the people finally realize they’ve been screwed. … yeah that might be a long long time from now. We’re more worried about our mortgages, our overdrawn credit cards our football our porn and our medical marijuana. We’re more concerned about letting sexually confused sickos “marry” another person of the same sex. We’re more concerned with providing those poor illegal immigrants drivers licenses, welfare, medical attention, jobs and amnesty. On and on and on. Our attention has been so diverted and buried under garbage …. I’m not sure ANYTHING is really going to be done about this.
We’re all probably “barking at the fucking moon.”
Moon barking aside, my bet, is that the Black Crows will find a way to duck the issue. I have no faith in them at all when it comes to really important things. Take the case before them now dealing with firearm ownership by someone convicted of a less than felony. Sure, that particular part of that law might get over turned, but, them trashing all of the ex post facto laws that have been passed in recent times? They will stick their collective heads in the sand.
I recently posted about my top 10 predictions for 2009, and most of the problems that I listed can be traced back to the Supreme Court in one way or another.
It’s funny kind of . . . and kind of not.
What you say reminds me of the chapter title in one of the books I read awhile back. The chapter was titled, “Supreme Sodomy.”
It seems, to me at least, that the so called supremes are no longer UNDER the “checks and balances” that is supposedly built into our system of Govt.
How did this happen ?
Why has it been allowed to continue unchecked ?
Visualize the Democrat voting electorate, like a herd of cattle, they are grossly unintelligent, possessing enough presence of mind to eat, drink, sleep, and reproduce and let’s not forget their most developed skill-following the herd. They lack enough self awareness to realize that , a) they are in this situation, and b)it is the result of years of active effort by the Democrat party and it’s union lackeys to convert our schools from institutions of learning to institutions of brain-washing and indoctrination. After all, we wouldn’t want a bunch of facts to get in the way of an election. So first thing in the morning when all you cows still don’t realize that the stench is you, go out once again and vote for the very people that have made you into the useful idiots that you are. You don’t know history, you don’t understand the Constitution , you don’t have the slightest clue about why it is important to not be so filled with hatred that you fail to properly investigate the qualifications of your own candidate. Oops!
Educated men are as much superior to uneducated men as the living are to the dead.
—Aristotle, 384–322 B.C.2
“Let,”
I would have added one word to what you said is all. A strategically placed “only” in this line
Visualize the Democrat voting electorate, like a herd of cattle, they are grossly unintelligent, possessing [ right here ] enough presence of mind to eat, drink, sleep, and reproduce and let’s not forget their most developed skill-following the herd. ……….
All in all though, you’ve made the call pretty accurately I’d have to say.
Keep it up. The more you harp on this, the more you discredit the far right cause you represent.
Hi Lynn,
Whatever “far-right cause” are you talking about? Sadly, because of the power-grubbing, ignorant, and brain-dead sheeple, obeying the U.S. Constitution has become a far-right cause. Can you prove that BHO was born to U.S. Citizens upon U.S. soil? [crickets chirping..]
Oooh oooohh yeah. You’re exactly right. No one should SAY anything about something like this. It just “discredits” them LOL – rolls eyes -
What a strange attitude to have – shrugs -
==============
Lynn Green // January 4, 2009 at 5:55 am
Keep it up. The more you harp on this, the more you discredit the far right cause you represent.
If breathing wasn’t an involuntary muscle response Barach-opods would suffocate. It is hard to imagine being to stupid to breathe but after months of ignoring the Obama BC issue it has become evident. This is not going away. It will either be resolved in the court room where it should be or in the streets where the conservatives have the decided advantage.
I think that it is sad that being an American, and supporting the Constitution and Bill of Rights is now considered to be “far right.”
It may only be my opinion, but I happen to think that the issue isn’t either far right, or far left. I think it is simply being an American.
The nation owes more than thanks to three unlikely modern day patriots: professional poker player, musician, and retired attorney, Leo Donofrio; life long Democrat and former Pennsylvania assistant attorney general, Phil Berg; and Soviet emigree and attorney, Dr. Orly Taitz (she’s also a dentist).
While Mr. Donofrio painstakingly established the airtight case that BHO could not be an Article II “natural born citizen” (at BHO’s birth, dad was British/Kenyan, not American, citizen) Leo’s Stay of the 12/15/08 electoral college vote was denied by SCOTUS as procedurally unripe.
Nevertheless, since no congressman and senator objected on 1/8/09 to Congress’ count and certification of the electoral vote which would have turned resolution of Obama’s eligibility issue over to Congress — rendering moot the Berg and Taitz (Lightfoot) cases — Berg finally does achieve standing on the issue of actual harm, to be addressed at the Friday 1/9/09 SCOTUS Conference on Writ of Certiorari. Obama’s failure to submit evidence of his constitutional qualification for the 1/9/09 conference will mean he cannot thereafter challenge Berg’s request to enjoin the 1/8/09 Congressional electoral count and certification, albeit retroactive, scheduled for SCOTUS conference Friday 1/16/09. Moreover, Chief Justice Roberts has scheduled a full Court conference on the Lightfoot case Friday 1/23/09 in the event there needs to be a Constitutionally mandated action, the Inauguration itself, to enjoin retroactively.
Now that BHO is in checkmate and cannot be POTUS, he can be a patriot as well. He need not subject the nation to the expense and trauma of requiring SCOTUS to overrule his ‘Presidency’. BHO can and should voluntarily step down with Biden becoming Acting POTUS under the 20th Amendment, and under the agreement all potential claims by the Government for itself and on behalf of others against BHO are released.
I am sick,sick, sick, of obamma this and obamma that.I just can`t believe that anyone ,wether you hate Bush,or repubs,or blacks or any other color,could ever vote for a person, that you don`t even know what he real fu%%%%%%% name is.He has more names then half the prisners in the U.S.. There is no trust in this election or will there ever be again.Our government and our way of life has been lost and gone ever since that sex maniac bill clinton show up with his big, red , coke covered nose.Since when did the people of our country let anybody that does drugs and admitts to it run for and then elect this assho%%.What a great example for our children to live by. I know this country is gone forever and when I am fighting for my last breath,protecting my family,and the innocent,I only hope that some of the people that have put us in this situation are near me so I could spit in their face befor I die.People are never satisfied with just life anymore.You are nothing but animals with animal instincs.
The current SCOTUS threshold for a MUST STAY of BHO’s inauguration is not whether he is ultimately determined constitutionally ineligible to be POTUS, merely whether there now is SERIOUS QUESTION on his constitutional eligibility, since any determination of inelligibility AFTER inauguration would pose unnecessary civil and military difficulties.
Sarah Obama is Barack Sr’s. step mother, not his mother.
The question is not IF there will be an interdiction of Obama’s Presidency by the Supreme Court, the questions are WHEN and HOW that interdiction will transpire — that is, if the USA is to continue as the Constitutional Republic that now exists.
IT IS MY OPINION THAT CHIEF
JUSTICE ROBERTS SHOULD NOT
SWEAR IN OBAMA UNTIL THE
BIRTH CERTIFICAE ISSUE IS
RESOLVED AND POSTPONE IT
UNTIL TUESDAY AFTER THE
1/23/09 MEETING.
My heart ached today during the inauguration. I am beyond sad that our nation no longer respects or upholds the Constitution. I do not understand why Obama has been permitted to become President without being a natural born citizen. Is there nobody to stop him? We must all pray for our nation and hope that the SCOTUS will do the job of defending the Constitution that they have been entrusted with. My brother-in-law basically says it’s a lost cause — we have to support Obama now that he’s President. But how can I respect someone who has been caught in so many deceptions and lies?
Your assumptions and reasoning regarding McCain’s eligibility is completely incorrect.
1. McCain lied about where he was born also. In a case brought against him in NH back in June, the attorney involved got his birth certificate that McCain ALSO would not produce. Any news reports contrary are pure lies. The hospital he claimed to be born at was not even BUILT until 5 years AFTER he was born.
2. He was actually born in the REPUBLIC of Panama, city of Colon which was not at the Naval Base that he lied about. It does not matter anyway because even at the Naval Base he would NOT qualify.
3. The Panama Canal Zone was NEVER US Territory anyway! It was merely leased for water rights by treaty. He was NOT born in the US or any of its territories AND he was born in the Republic of Panama which was subject to completely different immigration laws than in the Canal Zone specifically that he claimed.
Either way, he was STILL NOT eligible to run for President and the press did not want this real story either, believe me I tried just as hard against him because I am a Constitutionalist NOT a party loyalist.
The next case against Obama hits the US Supreme Court on Friday the 23rd and is the strongest of all of them to hit the Supreme Court so far because the Plaintiff, Gail Lightfoot was a VP candidate on the ballot in CA, so she has legal standing that all the rest were thrown out because of. Her attorney also is handling the Alan Keyes which is yet another separate case. The best thing is that this attorney Dr. Orly Taitz knows that McCain is not eligible either as we need to correct BOTH of these wrongs or nothing will ever be right.
Lori Stacey
Take the test.
FIRST QUESTION: Who IS the actual and lawful 44th President of the USA?
ANSWER: Joe Biden
Biden was initially the Acting President for at least 5 minutes under either the Constitution’s Article 2 or the Constitution’s 20th Amendment, from 12:00 Noon 1/20/09, having already taken his Oath of Office and before Obama completed his ‘oath’ at approximately 12:05 PM, 1/20/09. Under the 20th Amendment if the President-elect shall have failed to qualify, or alternatively under Article 2 if the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties, at the time fixed for the beginning of the term, being 12:00 Noon 1/20/09, which ability and/or qualification includes that he take the Article 2 oath “before he enter on the execution of his office,” then either the Presidency shall devolve on the Vice President under Article 2 or the Vice President shall act as President under the 20th Amendment. (The importance of the oath in ‘commencing’ an ‘Obama Presidency’ — rather than merely the 1/20/09 Noon time — is confirmed by the re-take of the ‘oath’ by Obama at the White House on 1/21/09 after the first ‘oath’ was NOT administered by Justice Roberts NOR recited by Obama in the words as required under Article 2.)
This is significant because at such time that the Supreme Court finally rules on the merits on Obama’s disqualification as not being an Article 2 “natural born citizen” (clearly he is NOT), Biden’s automatic status (without needing to take a separate Presidential Oath) of being President would be predicated upon four different bases: First, having been Vice President under Article 2; second, having been Vice President-elect under the 20th Amendment; third, having been actual President in the hiatus before Obama took the ‘oath(s)’; and fourth, retroactively deemed President during the full period of the Obama usurpation so that the acts of the Federal Government under the usurpation can be deemed authorized and/or ratified by Biden’s legitimacy.
SECOND QUESTION: Who will be the 45th President?
ANSWER: Hillary Clinton
One must assume that Bill and Hillary Clinton have been aware of all of the above. Biden’s wife recently “let the cat out of the bag” on the Oprah Show that both Biden and Hillary had considered alternatively Veep or Secretary of State, in either case, setting up Hillary to be President on a vote of the Democratic Congress if need be.
THIRD QUESTION: Is Obama an unwitting victim of this troika or a knowing participant?
ANSWER: Yet undetermined.
I was once a PR Director for a well know rock musician. I saw the same glazed over look on the faces of the Barach-opods as I did on the worshipping faces of the fans. They were so mezmerized that they were completely unable to gather their senses. Rather disturbing I might add. Obama is a usurper and will never be my president nor the president of millions of other patriots. The man is an irresponsible crook. Here is a guy who spent over a million dollars to conceal a twelve dollar BC and I am suppose to trust him with the federal budget? Uhh! I don’t think so.
Article 2, section 1 of the Constitution reads:
“no person except a natural born citizen, OR a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this constitution, shall be eligible to the office of president.”
He DOES fit that doesn’t he ? He IS a “citizen of the United States” right ?
What am I missing ?
Thanks Lori,
I have never heard any of the “facts” you state regarding McCain’s eligibility. IF they are true, I agree with your basic conclusion. Our President, from whatever party, or no party, needs to be duly Constitutionally qualified.
What was that thing that I believe Congress passed before the election regarding McCain’s eligibility – which BHO not only signed but reportedly “co-authored” – which deemed McCain’s candidacy as kosher??
Was it illegitimate? Does it have ANY enforceability (for McCain)? What about if Amendment XX comes into play – doesn’t Congress have their say to resolve the new President? How?
The Joint Chiefs of Staff HAVE AN ABSOLUTE CONSTITUTIONAL DUTY to stand behind Guantanamo Military Judge James Pohl UNTIL OBAMA OVERCOMES “RES IPSA LOQUITUR” BY SUPPLYING HIS LONG FORM BIRTH CERTIFICATE AND PROVING HIS ELIGIBILITY TO BE PRESIDENT UNDER ARTICLE 2 OF THE US CONSTITUTION.