by PaulRevere2
Another Reason Not to vote for Obama (I)
The single biggest threat to the planet today is Islam. It didn’t used to be that way. Before the discovery of oil in Muslim countries, it was difficult for them to carry jihad more than locally. Today, they have the means to export it anywhere in the world, and if we let them, soon they will be able to deliver a blow that takes out several million at one time. They’ve said they want it, they’ve said nothing will stop them, and they’ve said they will use it when they get it. Are we going to take them at their word? Yet even now, the burning disdain for the West must be at least only 50/50, because they gotta love the power that oil dollars give them to attempt world wide submission of everyone to the will of Allah.
That is the goal, you know. And that is the single biggest foreign policy fact any US presidential candidate needs to know. One of our candidates knows it and calls it like it is. The other isn’t quite sure, or doesn’t really care. The candidate that has received millions in “individual contributions” via Saudi Arabia is the one who’s not sure.
Barack Obama is set to give away the farm, and guess what? You’re the cow. Ready for slaughter?
In his own words he describes how he will dismantle US protections,
- “I’m the only major candidate that opposed this war from the beginning, and as president, I will end it” Okay, we all don’t like war. But how does Obama plan to change the mind of Islamic power mongers like Iran’s President Ahmadinejad, who is absolutely convinced it is his religions duty to accelerate World War III to hasten the coming of the “12th Imam?” How do you convince people like that – especially when Iran goes nuclear – to not use the weapons that Allah has given them against the Jews (Israel), Christians (US) and all kaffurs (unbelievers) everywhere? The short answer is, “you wont.” And Osama Bin Laden isn’t done yet either. Yes, we’ve lost thousands. But if we don’t show some resolve, we’re going to lose millions. That is what it took in WWII – 47 million civilian deaths – before we put our foot down and said, “enough.” And Hitler didn’t have nukes. I fear we don’t have what it takes in this “not-so-greatest-generation” to recognize evil and do something about it. We may have to lose a couple major cities before we say, “enough.” Obama doesn’t have the big picture. If he is elected, history may repeat itself. I hope our next president has the vision to see the holocaust on the horizon, and head it off before it gets here.
- “Will cut expenses on unproven missile defense systems” “I will not weaponize space.” “I will slow our development of future combat systems.” China hasalready started to weaponize space. With the way they are on the fast track to “world superpower” status, do you think for a second they will hesitate to overrun struggling Russia? Or use it against us if we try to stop them? China desperately needs resources to accommodate their growth and a place to put all their people. Russia has gobs of space and a heavily declining populace, which already doesn’t have enough manpower to even keep track of all their Cold War era arsenals. Soon they will be defenseless by attrition. Not to mention the fact that Russia’s president has been issuing Cold War rhetoric that we have not seen in 20 years. He has indicated that the nuclear option is on the table to control Georgia and other former states. He may feel he has something to prove unless Russia is going to be relegated to the scrap heap of history. Do you think the poor and relatively defenseless people of Georgia want the US president to cut expenses and pull missiles out of Eurabia? “…to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States” is the oath the president takes. Obama’s stance – slowing development of future combat systems – shows an unwillingness to do the presidential job.
- “I will set a goal of a world without nuclear weapons” “I will not develop new nuclear weapons, I will seek a global goal on the production of fissile material, and I will negotiate with Russia to take our ICBM’s off hair-trigger alert and to achieve deep cuts in our nuclear arsenals.” You can’t un-cork the nuclear genie. He’s out. And everyone wants him. A desperate Russia has sold off lots of them, and may still use them. Iran and Al-Qeada would love to rub the genie’s lamp to rub out millions of kaffurs (dirty, filthy, unbelievers) and glorify Allah by securing infidel deaths. The only ones on the planet who can be trusted with nukes are a biblically moral people (who value life) who do not indiscriminately run around threatening to annihilate their neighbors. Several Islamic leaders have loudly and publicly made these threats, and do it, repeatedly. Ya gotta hand it to them for consistency; we know for sure what they stand for (if anyone cares to really listen to them). Yes “the bomb” killed tens of thousands in Japan in WWII, and perhaps some people just think the size of that bomb made that act evil. Two things: First Japan’s Emperor Hirohito killed hundreds of thousands, and was on his way to killing hundreds of thousands more; aspirations that I’m sure make Ahmadinejad and Bin Laden salivate, (or is that “foam at the mouth?”) Anyway, we saved the lives of Hirohito’s future victims by bombing when we did. AND second, we would have bombed the snot out of Japan with conventional weapons anyway (for weeks, and perhaps months more) until they gave up; “the bomb” just hastened the end, which really, could have saved Japaneselives. It should also be noted that Japan’s part in WWII was a religiously driven war; Japan practiced emperor worship at the time, and the emperor was considered god, and not one had better disobey “god.” And now, one had better not disobey Allah (see the quote below). Only a biblically moral people – who value life - can calculate the plusses of bombing verses the advancement of uncontrolled, unbelievably savage evil.
And that IS what we’re dealing with. I’ve said it before, and I’m going to say it again: I think there are moderate Muslims, but there is no moderate Islam. The closer you get to the Qur’an, Allah, and Mohammed, the more intent you get on following Mohammed’s dictates, and snuffing out all that is not Islam (“submission”). That is mandated in the Qur’an. If you’re following the Islamic holy book, you have only one choice. If you turn your back on your duty, you are worse than and infidel.
“Believers, what is the matter with you, that when you are asked to march forth in the Cause of Allah (i.e., Jihad) you cling to the earth? Do you prefer the life of this world to the Hereafter? Unless you march, He will afflict and punish you with a painful torture, and put others in your place.” (Qur’an 9:38)
There is no “live and let live” for the truly devoted Muslim. Indeed that is what most of the Muslim-on-Muslim attacks are about; the other Muslim isn’t Muslim enough. Or he’s the wrongkind of Muslim. Ahmadinejad doesn’t give two shakes of a pig’s tail about “innocents.” In his mind there are no innocents; in the case of nuclear blast, all the believers will join Allah in paradise, and all infidels will get their just reward burning in the fires of hell. And the thought of that makes him smile.
This is what we’re dealing with!
“Moderate Islam is prostration to the West”
and
“Battle, animosity, and hatred — directed from the Muslim to the infidel — is the foundation of our religion”
This is what we’re dealing with!
And they don’t care about global warming either; Every nuke on an American or European city is cause for a weenie roast (pork-free, of course).
We don’t need a sharply polished celebrity president who brazenly (and foolishly) touts that they will be the leader in disarmament to be a good example to the world. The world just isn’t that friendly, and any candidate that thinks so must be stopped. For better or worse, the world depends on us to keep evil at bay. Not to conquer – because we could have conquered Iraq a long time ago – but to allow good to succeed.
Islamic terrorists worldwide are pulling for Obama. There’s a reason for that. Please join me in supporting the candidate that terrorists aren’t supporting.
Readers Say: