Obama’s RedPrint Plan for Change
Major Hat Tip to TRM from d=s for making another banner and widget for me. Thank You, TRM!
PART ONE:
by Tracy at No Compromise July 15, 2008Barack Hussein Obama has written a sixty-four page dribble, and drool homily on his plan for change in America. I decided to take this plan on, and go through each point of his unending preaching, and show YOU, Voter American, why each point he makes is nothing new, but the same old Marxist agenda found in the Commie Manifesto written in the 19th century by tyrants, Marx & Engels. However, going through each point of this nonsense will only cause a ton of work for me, and be non-interesting reading for you, so I am going to just deal with each section. Suffice it to say, that you can read this sixty-four page of commie plans against this nation, and make your comments at the bottom of this piece.
I will be doing a daily or bi-weekly blog piece with the archives of this compilation found in the pages up at the top of this blog. I’m also creating a widget for anyone who wants to put one on their blogs, so their readers can see the slow disintegration of our beloved Republic.
I am sick to death of hearing these secular religionists of commie doctrines claim they have something new and innovative, when in fact with a little reading we discover they are only dribbling out the same ole crap from the commie freaks of old who were, and are, hell bent on Kontrolling you, your education, your speech, your health, your job, your family, your form of transportation, your associations, where you live, and everything else that you would consider your own business, and self interest!
And you know why, People? Because we have let them! We have believed these lies, we have sunk our hard earned money on these commiemongers, and we have not risen to the occasion of thinking, and acting against their commie lie of a utopian wurkers paradise not found in any commie country to date! And now they have a strong hold on this Kountry. This Kountry, that used to be the beacon for Freedom, and real Hope around the world! Real Hope! Not Kontrol redefined as Hope.
We see countries like China and Russia going towards free enterprise, and lowering their taxes to seeing Americans ALLOWING THEMSELVES to be taxed and regulated out of the world economy and into a Socialist order! We see leaders of countries in the Baltic who are calling this Global Warming crap, LIES! And what do AmeriKans do? We not only believe this DUNG, we spend what little hard money we have left on buying cloth bags to put our groceries in out of guilt and shame that we are harming Mother Earth! As if a cloth bag or curly mercury vapor-filled, lead poisoned light bulb will stop the sun from getting warmer or cooling off! As if human beings have any congtrol over what God has control over! Of course, the BIG bucks are spent for carbon neutral offsets which is the biggest freaKin’ scam since ENRON! Guess who’s getting rich off that scam? al-Gore and his commie running dogs! Again, YOU’RE buying this crap!
Good Grief ! What the HELL are we thinKing??? These morons have redefined language to hide what they’re really doing, and blaming YOU for it! What’s worse is YOU actually believe it!
So here is a section by section discussion on Komrade Obama’s RedPrint Plan for change TO America which you will see the red commie comparison after each section!
And they call the Conservatives the Reds!
Section One: Shine Light on Washington Lobbying
Here’s some Big Bubby plans for you to think about~
Centralize Ethics and Lobbying Information for Voters:This all sounds good on the surface but the sixth plank to the Commie Manifesto is all about centralizing anything and everything. The word centralize requires another layer of bureaucraZy and this is where commies like BHMO get away with making statements like, “Barack’s plan will create jobs!” No, Barack’s plan will create GOVERNMENT JOBS not private sector jobs. By the way, we already have private non-profits out there who have data bases of all of this information. Why else would the Dems lie when they say they care about Kontroling lobbyists?
Require Independent Monitoring of Lobbying Laws and Ethics Rules: Hussein wants to use the POWERS of the President to create an “independent” watchdog agency to oversee congressional ethics violations. Is he trying to shove his morality down other people’s throats? LOL! I had to say that! So here we are, in the middle of WWIII, and he is using his power of the president to create another bureaucratic Big Bubby program, and then he calls it “INDEPENDENT?” Yep, if the American public buys this crap they’re more stupid naive than I thought! Can you put Government and Independent in the same sentence and actually sound like you know what you’re talking about? Can you actually put the phrase “powers of the President” in the same sentence as watchdog agency and not come off looking like a real buffoon?
We already have a mechanism to hold corrupt government officials accountable: It is called the Grand Jury! Being empaneled entirely of non-governmentally employed American Citizens, exclusively for the purpose of hearing charges of High Crimes and Misdemeanors against corrupt government officials. There is also the impeachment process, which could be used after a corrupt official has been indicted by a Grand Jury of ordinary American Citizens. We, the People, MUST DEMAND the USE of these Constitutional mechanisms MORE OFTEN!
Support Campaign Finance Reform: Hussein supports the idea the YOU, Joe Taxpayer, fund campaigns including tv and radio time with tax dollars! Here is a direct quote from his RedPrint Plan for Change in AmeriKa,
Obama supports public financing of campaigns . . . as a way to reduce the influence of moneyed special interests,” and “introduced public financing legislation in the Illinois State Senate, and is the only 2008 candidate to have sponsored . . . Feingold’s (D-WI) tough bill to reform the presidential public financing system.” Interesting huh? Now check this out: “Barack Obama rejected public funding for the fall presidential campaign yesterday, a dramatic blow to 1970s good-government reform that has been overwhelmed by an explosion of private money.” This is a quote from the Boston.com piece entitled, ‘In a shift, Obama rejects public funding’
Now there he goes again doin’ that changing thang! Is this Leadership, I ask? He doesn’t even support his own Ideas! I ask, how did he “talk” his way out of this reversal of belief “for thee, but not for me” rhetoric? He said the system is broken! And the Obamunists believe it! Do you believe him?
Ever since McCain-Feingold, it has become even harder for anyone to run for President if they do not have multi-millions of $$$$$$ either in their own estate, or else big rich donors. It is now impossible today for Reagan to run the same campaign that he did in 1980, because he simply would not have had enough money to do it. Rather than reducing campaign costs, this legislation that both candidates supported, has exorbitantly increased the cost requirements to run a campaign!
Let me make a prediction here: If Barack Hussein Obama wins I bet you we will see the government Kontrolled Kampaign Finance Reform so you, Joe Taxpayer, will start having to pay that dollar (LOL! Hell, dollar? more like 100 dollars!) on your taxes to fund these never ending public mockeries called campaigns. We won’t have a choice in this matter if Komarde BaracK gets his way and a Komarade Kontrolled Kongress to do this! Does this sound American?
We do have a choice in this matter: Tell Barack Hussein Obama and these freakin’ Kongress Kritters their terms are up! NOW!
Finally, as I promised I will show you how this section of Obama’s RedPrint Plan for Change against Amerika is in lockstep with one or more of the 10 Planks of the Communist Manifesto, and the Communist Party Platform.
This section Konforms to Plank #6 regarding the centralization of whatever, means, in this case, the means of paying for a person’s choice to run for office using the hard earned dollars of people who may not want to vote for them, or who don’t even vote, but pay taxes! This centralization requires the government to build a bureaucraZy to force the issue, and to monitor it. I also believe it violates the separation of powers because it is the job of Kongress to create agencies , not the president. It also lines up with Plank #2: A heavy progressive or graduated income tax. Forcing taxpayers to pay for stoopid crap like Kampaign Finance Reform WILL increase your taxes and DECREASE your family income, no matter how you cut it, no matter what you call it! Click here to see the Commies Party USA (oxyMORAN on those two words in that same phrase, if you ask me) on campaign finance reform and other electoral issues.
Let me end this piece by quoting Thomas Jefferson who understood corruption and tyranny:
“[T]he rational and peacable instrument of reform, the suffrage of the people.” Need I say more?
References
Author & Date Unknown. Lenin and the first communist revolutions, VII. Retrieved from July 15, 2008, http://www.gmu.edu/departments/economics/bcaplan/museum/his1g.htm
Leicester P. F. (Ed.) (1905) The works of Thomas Jefferson. Vol. 12, p. 136.. New York: G.P. Putnam’s Sons.
Mooney, B. (2008). In a shift, Obama rejects public funding. Retrieved July 15, 2008,
http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2008/06/20/in_a_shift_obama_rejects_public_funding/
###
Code for sidebar blog button: 
<p style=”text-align:center;”><a href=”http://gto7.wordpress.com/obamas-red-print-plan-for-change/”><img src=”http://gto7.files.wordpress.com/2008/07/67-points-b-whtbck-180.png”></a>
If you have trouble making this code work retype the quote marks in the exact place they are now, and that ought to fix the problem.
Wow, great article. Obama absolutely has communist leanings, but also marxist, elitist, socialist, there is a mish-mash. He has always been searching for a belief, a religion, a nationality, a race, searching to belong.
The odd thing is, he is still searching. We all know what happens if you are not built on a firm foundation, but built on shifting sand … If you are luke warm, and neither hot nor cold.
He is still searching, which means he is subject to whomever is whispering in his ear. Could be why his views on Iraq and other things continue to shift.
Is this a blogburst article, or do you just want us to post the image in our sidebar?
Bravo! What an undertaking. Good on you.
Go get ‘em!
If he gets elected, we will have an OBAMAnation!
Thanks Debbie. Interesting point. Yes, just because they end up in these positions doesn’t mean that they have it together and clearly he does not! He takes courage to take a stand even if you are wrong! he can’t do that at least today and I doubt tomorrow.
This is a temporary blog burst series until these elections are over, so that would be great if you could place the widget in your sidebar until then. Obviously, you have permission to post it on your blog if you so choose. I really want to use this time to go through his entire 64 pages and show how he really is a commie which is a marxist which is a progressive. They are all cut from the same cloth, they just use different names to disguise their nature.
And thanks Velvet Hammer, and Jill. It’s great so see you both!
Thanks a bunch!
I will simply post the image in the sidebar, and do a short post with a link back here so readers can come here and read the entire article and your follow-up articles.
Wow. Kinda over the top, aren’t we?
Why not just come out and say “I think Obama is a big scary Muslim Communist, Boo!”? Alternatively, you could take the bits of your post that contain quite valid if not sound criticism, and just address those directly.
And you might want to plug up some of the gaping idealogical holes in your arguments. For instance, centralization is an aspect of many forms of government, including our own federal system. Were the federalists communists?
great job!..undivided Jerusalem ..my tuchus!
what a lying tool he is!
Dan, welcome.
Our Republic is not a centralized form of government. In the old Soviet Union, the entire country was in lock down to one centralized government. One government ran every single issue a country has from the courts, agencies, food distribution, transportation everything even where people lived.
There was no checks and balances.
In our Republic form of government, we have 50 states that have there own Constitution right to exist and have boundries, and a federal jurisdiction with checks and balances dealt out to three branches of gov’t for the very purpose to avoid the US becoming a centralized government!
Here’s a quote from the one who wrote the Declaration of Independence on this matter:
(T)he way to have a good and safe government is not to trust it all to one, but to divide it among the many…What has destroyed liberty and the rights of man in every government has ever existed under the Sun? The generalizing and the concentrating [of] all cares and powers into one body.
(Letter to Joseph C. Cabell, 1816). THOMAS JEFFERSON ON DEMOCRACY 162 (S. Padover Ed. 1953).
Barack Hussein Obama wants to centralize way too much! In fact, this government has gone the way of the Soviets! It didn’t work for them, and it won’t work for us!
There never has been a utopian wurker’s paradise on planet earth and there never will be until Jesus Christ comes back to this earth! And then it won’t be the kind of paradise you may think of!
Please do your own homework so you can understand what form of gov’t you live under! By the way, you will not find the word democracy in our Declaration of Independence, Preamble to the Constitution, Constitution, or Bill of Rights! Why? because we do not have a democracy we have a Republic form of gov’t.
Thank you for your comment.
No Compromises,
Hi, and thanks.
Our Republic is indeed partially centralized through the federal government, both in theory and in practice. Checks and balances are perfectly compatible with a centralized system, at least in the form that you appear to be protesting (namely Obama’s idea of an independent watchdog group for lobbyists). What he is proposing is simply another check, this time on lobbyists.
As far as centralizing data on ethics for public officials, remember this one of the folks behind google for government. While there can always be competitors (and I expect the sunlight project will have some nifty alternatives), an effort to put up searchable info on matters pertaining to ethics, lobbying, etc, can only be a great thing. Think thomas, the legislative search engine. Very useful, whether you support or oppose the legislation you are looking up. Centralization is not by nature a bad thing.
In terms of concentrating power in one body, that would be our current President, George Bush and VP Dick Cheney, who stand guilty. After all, they presided over the most power hungry administration in this nation’s history. They did everything they could to amass more power in the hands of the executive branch. Obama’s pledged to reverse that. Has McCain?
I don’t know where you think I find communism in any way an attractive, viable, or even consistent political idealogy. I don’t. And neither does Obama.
I’ve done my homework, have you?
Thanks for your response.
No, you have not done your homework, Dan, because it takes a Kongress to pass laws in this country, not the President; and we all know our demoKratic Kontrolled Kongress has a lower approval rating than the Pres., because they refuse to do anything good for this wonderful country. They do however, know how to shift blame and play parlor tricks. Sort of what you’re doing right now.
Your hate/blame Bush, Cheney and Haliburton crap is just that, crap!
We already have sunshine laws and plenty of organizations out there who keep their sharp eyes out for this stuff. We could start by getting rid of people like traitor and Syrian sister Pelosi who gets her millions by making it off our tax money.
Isn’t it rather queer that when the socialists start accusing others of ANYTHING, you can be guarandamnteed it’s because that’s EXACTLY what they are doing themselves!
If you are a Progressive, and I gather you are, because you are supporting the NUMBER ONE most Leftist voting Senator in Congress, then how can you say with a straight face that you don’t support Kommunism?
A little postmodern redefining, anyone?
Just because you call yourself a Progressive, or a liberal, doesn’t take away from the fact that what you believe in, that is, freakin’ huge gov’t from womb to the tomb just like the commies do, is really what matters here.
I’m merely calling it by its’ original name. Why deny it, just because it doesn’t sound so appealing to the proletariat? It’s not what you call it or the name that you give it that matters, it’s what it truly IS in its’ own nature, that matters!
Since Woodrow Wilson, we have been marching inexorably closer and closer to a Socialist state, and that is why I am writing this series. Nobama is the number one leftist, and his collectivist, government centralizing ideology WILL most certainly bring this Republic so much closer to a Kommunist state that it’s freakin’ scary!
I could not get the code for the image to work, so I did it my way. TypePad is weird.
Ya know, I think it might be because of those quote marks. I’ll note that above and thanks for alerting me to that.
“In terms of concentrating power in one body, that would be our current President, George Bush and VP Dick Cheney, who stand guilty. After all, they presided over the most power hungry administration in this nation’s history. They did everything they could to amass more power in the hands of the executive branch. Obama’s pledged to reverse that. Has McCain?”
Even worse than FDR? I find THAT very hard to believe.
FDR massively expanded and usurped the powers of the President beyond any Constitutional limits of any President before him and since. Nobody has come close to his level of Government multiplication, although LBJ probably may be in 2nd place, and Woodrow Wilson in 3rd. It may even be true that Bush is in 4th or 5th place, but these are just guesses. The objective measure would be to compare the federal budget of the year that the president leaves office and divide that by the federal budget when he was inaugurated. Would be an interesting study, and is a question that could be settled objectively and scientifically, without depending upon uncertain conjecture or subjective opinion.
What an undertaking is right!
Goint to print out so I can read it at my leisure, NC.
P.S. You’ve got some real comment gold here.